Search Results for "re-development agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "re-development agreement"

515 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 515 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Wife's Right to Reside in Matrimonial Home Under MHADA Scheme — Emphasizes Rehabilitation of Dishoused Occupiers. The Court held that the wife's right to residence is not absolute and must be balanced with the rights of co-owners and the terms of the redevelopment agreement under Section 95-A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

27 Apr 2020

The appellant, Aishwarya Atul Pusalkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking enforcement of her right to reside in her matrimoni...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.

24 Apr 2012

The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Suit for Specific Performance Against Cooperative Housing Society and Members Due to Lack of Privity and Authority. The court held that a cooperative society cannot bind its members to a development agreement without their consent, and the suit was not maintainable.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiff, Vardhman Developers Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against Borla Co-operative Housing Society L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Challenges to Slum Rehabilitation Orders Under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Rehabilitation) Act, 1971 — Dispute Over Competing Developer Appointments and Scheme Cancellation. The court examined legality of High Power Committee order setting aside Slum Rehabilitation Authority appointment and SRA letter cancelling scheme, involving multiple slum dweller societies and developers.

20 Oct 2021

The judgment under consideration is a consolidated order of the Bombay High Court dealing with a group of writ petitions and contempt petitions arisin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order Terminating Arbitration for Lack of Arbitration Agreement. Developer Fails to Prove Existence of Arbitration Clause in Development Agreement with Cooperative Housing Society.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Panama Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately

19 Jan 2026

The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. AGRC's order directing SRA to decide on eligibility of slum dwellers for rehabilitation based on cut-off date upheld as valid exercise of appellate jurisdiction under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

2 Apr 2024

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Sateri Builders and Developers LLP (the Developer) and Shree Gurukrupa (SRA) Co-operative Ho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).

28 Jan 2011

The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition for Interim Relief and Arbitrator Appointment in Redevelopment Dispute -- Section 9 and Section 11 of Arbitration Act Applications Denied

23 Jan 2026

The High Court dismissed both petitions filed by Petitioner against Respondents -- The Petitioner sought interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Authority's Rejection of Building Proposal for Non-Compliance with DCR and Non-Refund of Deposit. Court upholds SRA's decision that the proposal was not in conformity with Development Control Regulations and that the deposit was not refundable as per the terms of the Letter of Intent.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Siddharth Constructions, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the deci...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)