Search Results for "promotion seniority"

811 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 811 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Service Law Case — Notional Financial Benefits Upheld Despite No Actual Promotion. Rule 54(1)(a) of West Bengal Service Rules Precludes Retrospective Promotion but Notional Benefits Granted Due to Administrative Delay.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the High Court at Calcutta which upheld an order of the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal directing tha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Inter Se Seniority Dispute Among Teachers Under Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools Rules, 1981 — Seniority Determined by Date of Entry into Category Based on Qualifications

The dispute in this appeal pertains to the inter se seniority of the appellant and the 5th respondent, both appointed as Assistant Teachers in a secon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal Order on Seniority and Promotions in MEPS Act Case. Seniority of teachers in aided schools must be determined based on continuous service in the cadre, not on the date of acquiring higher qualifications.

The petitioner, Chagan s/o Namdeorao Athawale, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the primary section of a school run by respondent No.2 on 1 Au...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seniority Determination in Assistant Teacher Cadre. Education Officer's Order Declaring Respondent No.4 as Senior and Entitled to Head Master Post Upheld Under Rule 12 of MEPS Rules, 1981.

The petitioner, Salim Gulab Mulla, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order passed by the Ed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioners, K.K. Bhaskaran and Sarjeet Singh, were working as Junior Engineers in the Electrical Department of the Administration of Union Territ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transfer Orders of Teachers in Jalna District. Transfer orders issued by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Jalna, were upheld as valid and not violative of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act, 1961.

The petitioners, 24 teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Jalna, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...