Search Results for "profit sharing"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "profit sharing"

91 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 91 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Violation of Status Quo Order in Arbitration Dispute. Status Quo Order Ambiguous and Not Willfully Disobeyed by Respondents in Sale of Flats Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

15 Jul 2026

The judgment arises from a contempt petition filed by Amkhim Holdings Pvt. Ltd. and Vasant Kotak & Bros. Trading & Investments Pvt. Ltd. against respo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Ex-Committee Members Under MCS Act. Failure to Furnish Minutes and Video Recording of AGM to Fellow Member Attracts Disqualification Under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

1 Jul 2026

The petitioners, who were ex-members of the managing committee of Vaishali Nagar Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged their disq...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award Holding Stockbroker Liable for Unauthorized Trades by Agent. Broker Failed to Prove Client Authorization for Disputed Trades, Resulting in Compensation of Rs.14,37,200/- to Client.

21 Apr 2026

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by IIFL Capital Services Limited (formerly IIFL Secu...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Power Supply Agreement Dispute — Abrupt Stoppage of Power Constitutes Breach. The Court upheld the arbitrator's award of damages and interest, finding no patent illegality under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 Mar 2026

The appellant, OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd., was the supplier of electricity under a power supply agreement dated 18.04.2018 with the respondent, Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief to Developer in Redevelopment Dispute — Restrains Cooperative Society from Terminating Letter of Intent Pending Arbitration. Termination of Development Agreement Found Prima Facie Invalid Under Section 9 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.

16 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Kalpataru Ltd, a real estate development company, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, seekin...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Cancellation of CL-2 Excise Licences for Alleged Distance Violation. Held that Rule 8(1) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 does not apply to shops existing before the 2002 amendment and that cancellation without proper notice violates natural justice.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnat...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

22 Aug 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Non-Compete Fee — Amount Received for Non-Compete Agreement Not Taxable as Business Income Under Section 28(va) of Income Tax Act, 1961 When Assessee Not Carrying on Business in Relevant Year. Non-Compete Fee is Capital Receipt, Not Business Income, and Not Taxable as Capital Gains as No Transfer of Capital Asset.

13 Apr 2015

The case involves two appeals by Arun Toshniwal and Anurag A. Toshniwal against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which held that ...

7 8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)