Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Ex-Committee Members Under MCS Act. Failure to Furnish Minutes and Video Recording of AGM to Fellow Member Attracts Disqualification Under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who were ex-members of the managing committee of Vaishali Nagar Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged their disqualification under Section 78(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The disqualification was ordered by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies on 6 May 2025 for failure to furnish demanded records, namely minutes of monthly managing committee meetings from April 2022 to March 2023 and a Compact Disk containing video recording of the Annual General Meeting held on 24 September 2023, to Respondent No.4, a fellow committee member. Respondent No.4 had made written demands on 5 October 2023 and 8 October 2023, enclosing cheques of Rs.200 each towards copying expenses. The petitioners did not supply the documents, leading to a complaint on the Government Portal. The Deputy Registrar disqualified the petitioners and appointed an Administrator. On appeal, the Joint Registrar upheld the disqualification but set aside the appointment of the Administrator. In revision, the Hon'ble Minister (Co-operation) upheld the Joint Registrar's order. The petitioners then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The High Court examined the concurrent findings of the three authorities and held that the failure to furnish records without reasonable cause attracts disqualification under Section 78(1)(b). The court noted that the petitioners had not provided any justification for non-supply and that the findings of fact were based on evidence. The court found no perversity or error of law warranting interference under Article 226. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed, upholding the disqualification of the petitioners.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Disqualification of Committee Members - Section 78(1)(b) MCS Act - Failure to Furnish Records - Petitioners, ex-members of managing committee, were disqualified for not supplying minutes of meetings and video recording of AGM demanded by Respondent No.4 - Concurrent findings by Deputy Registrar, Joint Registrar, and Minister upheld - Held that failure to furnish records without reasonable cause attracts disqualification under Section 78(1)(b) (Paras 1-20).

B) Co-operative Law - Right of Member to Access Records - Section 78(1)(b) MCS Act - Member's Right to Information - Respondent No.4, a committee member, demanded minutes and video recording - Petitioners failed to supply despite payment of copying fees - Held that member has a right to access records and non-supply without justification leads to disqualification (Paras 3-10).

C) Constitutional Law - Judicial Review - Article 226 of Constitution of India - Scope of Interference - Petitioners challenged concurrent findings of three authorities - Court held that findings of fact based on evidence cannot be interfered with unless perverse or based on no evidence - Held that no perversity shown, hence no interference (Paras 18-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the disqualification of petitioners under Section 78(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 for failure to furnish demanded records to a member is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition dismissed. The orders of disqualification passed by the Deputy Registrar, Joint Registrar, and Minister are upheld.

Law Points

  • Disqualification under Section 78(1)(b) MCS Act
  • Failure to furnish records
  • Concurrent findings
  • Scope of judicial review under Article 226
  • Right of member to access records
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 11

Writ Petition No. 7757 of 2026

2026-07-01

Sandeep V. Marne, J.

Mr. Aseem Naphade with Mr. Sanjeel Kadam, Ms. Sayalee Rajpurkar i/b M/s. Kadam & Co. for the Petitioner; Mr. Tejas Deshmukh with Mr. Ronak M. Utagikar and Mr. Shubham Lolge for Respondent No.4; Ms. S. D. Chipade, AGP for Respondent-State.

Shashikant M. Ramane and Ors.

Joint Registrar Co-operative Societies, SRA/MHADA and Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 challenging disqualification of ex-members of managing committee of a co-operative housing society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought quashing of orders of Deputy Registrar, Joint Registrar, and Minister disqualifying them under Section 78(1)(b) of MCS Act.

Filing Reason

Petitioners were disqualified for failure to furnish demanded records (minutes of meetings and video recording of AGM) to Respondent No.4.

Previous Decisions

Deputy Registrar disqualified petitioners and appointed Administrator on 6 May 2025; Joint Registrar upheld disqualification but set aside appointment of Administrator on 24 June 2025; Minister (Co-operation) upheld Joint Registrar's order on 21 April 2026.

Issues

Whether the disqualification of petitioners under Section 78(1)(b) of MCS Act for failure to furnish records is sustainable. Whether concurrent findings of fact by three authorities can be interfered with under Article 226.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had reasonable cause for not supplying records, but no specific justification was provided in the judgment. Respondents supported the concurrent findings and argued that failure to furnish records without cause attracts disqualification.

Ratio Decidendi

Failure to furnish records demanded by a member of a co-operative society without reasonable cause attracts disqualification under Section 78(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Concurrent findings of fact by authorities based on evidence cannot be interfered with under Article 226 unless perverse or based on no evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners are ex-members of co-operative housing society and are aggrieved by their disqualification ordered by the Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies... on account of failure on their part to furnish to Respondent No.4 the demanded records of the society. Petitioners thus question correctness of concurrent findings recorded by three authorities about they incurring the disqualification.

Procedural History

Deputy Registrar passed order on 6 May 2025 disqualifying petitioners and appointing Administrator. Petitioners appealed to Joint Registrar who on 24 June 2025 upheld disqualification but set aside appointment of Administrator. Petitioners filed revision before Hon'ble Minister (Co-operation) who on 21 April 2026 upheld Joint Registrar's order. Petitioners then filed writ petition under Article 226 before Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 78(1)(b)
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Ejectment Decree in Rent Control Matter — Tenant's Subletting and Unauthorised Construction Justify Eviction Under Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. Concurrent findings of fa...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Ejectment Suit — No Prejudice to Plaintiff as Trial Not Commenced. Amendment Sought to Clarify Defence of Tenancy and Possession Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC, 1908.