Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Upholds Excise License Renewal for Bars and Restaurants Despite Minor Irregularities in Application Process. License Renewal Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defects When Licensee Has Substantially Complied with Conditions and Paid Fees.

The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka and its excise authorities against orders of a learned Single Judge directing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case Against SEBI. Regulatory fees collected under SEBI Act, 1992 are statutory levies, not consideration for taxable service under Finance Act, 1994.

The Principal Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Mumbai East, filed an appeal under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Tribunal Order Quashing Penalty on Directors in Central Excise Case — No Vicarious Liability Without Evidence of Personal Involvement Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Aurangabad, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appe...