Search Results for "payment and settlement systems"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recall of Witness and Additional Documents in Commercial Suit — Upholds Liberal Approach Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC. Party Seeking to Place on Record E-Mails and Recall PW-1 for Cross-Examination Must Be Permitted to Ensure Fair Trial and Effective Adjudication.

The dispute arose from a Professional Services Agreement dated 19th February 2013 between M/s. Levitate Mobile Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (LMT), the appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute Over 'Change in Law' Clause — High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act. Interpretation of contractual clause by Arbitral Tribunal was plausible and not perverse, hence not liable to be set aside under Section 34.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by South East Asia Marine Engineering and Constructions Ltd. (SEAMEC Ltd.) against the judgment of the Gauh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 378(4) CrPC in Section 138 NI Act Case - Appeal Against Acquittal in Private Complaint Lies Under Section 378(4) CrPC, Not Proviso to Section 372 CrPC

The case involved a reference to a larger bench to resolve a conflict regarding the maintainability of an appeal against acquittal in a prosecution un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Single Judge's Order Partially Setting Aside Arbitral Award. The Court affirmed reduction of interest rate from 18% to 12% per annum and setting aside of claim nos. (d) and (g) and interest on security deposit.

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (IOCL) against a judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Husband Guilty of Contempt for Wilful Disobedience of Maintenance Order. Non-compliance with Family Court's maintenance order for over two years despite notice of contempt petition amounts to wilful disobedience under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The contempt petition was filed by the wife, Amita B Devnani, against her husband Bhagwan H Devnani and others, alleging wilful disobedience of an ord...