Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Mining Lease Dispute. Court upholds award of specific performance and damages for breach of contract under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an arbitral award dated 30th September 2004 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of contract, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Electricity Transmission Contract Dispute. Court upholds majority award granting escalation costs and interest to contractor for delays caused by principal.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., challenged a majority arbitral award dated 6 January 2017 under Section 34 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Government of Israel in Commercial Lease Dispute. Arbitrator's Rejection of Set-Off and Counter-Claim as Time-Barred Upheld as Not Patently Illegal.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Breach of Contract Dispute — Payment Direction Inconsistent with Findings. Court holds that an arbitral tribunal cannot grant relief contrary to its own findings on merits, applying Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Hersheys India Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...