Search Results for "panchayat raj"

539 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 539 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Quashes FIRs in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Lack of Criminal Intent. Allegations of cheating, forgery, and criminal trespass found to be civil disputes without criminal ingredients under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 447, 427, 506(ii) read with 34 IPC.

The judgment concerns three connected criminal writ petitions arising from a land dispute in Salvador-Do-Mundo, Goa. The petitioners in WPCR 64/2021 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Panchayat Licensing Dispute Over Hot Mix Plant. Kerala Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Act, 2019 Does Not Override Kerala Panchayat Building Rules, 2019, and Panchayat License Cannot Be Deemed Granted Under MSME Act.

The dispute originated when George Elias and Associates, a road works contractor, filed two writ petitions before the Kerala High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Disqualification of Taluk Panchayat Member in Election Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Not Served. Disqualification under Section 12(1) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 set aside due to lack of opportunity of hearing.

The petitioner, Smt. Palakshamma, was elected as a Taluk Panchayat Member of Davangere Taluk Panchayat. On 12.11.2013, one Sri. Chinnasamudra Shekar N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Zilla Panchayat Election Notification Due to Delay and Laches. Petitions Filed After Commencement of Election Process Are Not Maintainable Under Article 226 of Constitution of India and Section 308 of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993.

The petitioners, who were Zilla Panchayat members from various constituencies in Chitradurga District, filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Against Adhyaksha for Violation of Mandatory Debate Requirement. Failure to Allow Debate Under Rule 3(3) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No-Confidence against Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat) Rules, 1994 Renders Motion Invalid.

The petitioner, H.N. Nagaveni, was elected as Adhyaksha (President) of Palagatti Grama Panchayat on 17.12.2012. On 21.12.2013, 15 members of the Panch...