Search Results for "order beyond notice"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "order beyond notice"

9663 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9663 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Legality of Orders under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 and Applicability of Repeal Act, 1999. Petition Seeks Quashing of Settlement, Notification, and Possession Orders Based on Erroneous Computation of Excess Land and Abatement of Proceedings.

13 Feb 2019

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the settlement order dated 30 November 2004 under Section 8(4) of the Urba...

High Court

W.P.NOS.16428 OF 2025, 25868 OF 2024, 25869 OF 2024,

9 Jul 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demolition Notice and Order by MCGM in Alleged Unauthorized Construction Case Finding Malafide Action. The Court held that the works were not in progress and the action under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 constituted legal malice.

27 Nov 2020

The petitioner, a film actor, purchased a bungalow in Bandra, Mumbai in 2017. In 2018, she carried out a structural audit and sought permission from t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Earlier Judgment in SARFAESI Auction Dispute — No Contempt Made Out as Subsequent Transfers Were Not in Breach of Court Orders. The Court held that the earlier judgment did not contain any specific direction restraining transfers, and the respondents had acted under colour of subsequent orders from the DRT and High Court.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed contempt petitions filed by Celir LLP, the successful auction purchaser, alleging wilful disobedience of its earlier judgm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Anonymous Complaint and Stale Incidents Insufficient to Sustain Preventive Detention. The court held that reliance on an unverified anonymous complaint and two criminal cases where the detenu was on bail did not justify preventive detention under Section 3(1) of the MPDA Act.

25 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Rupesh Ram Thakur, challenged a detention order dated 25-2-2004 passed under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears writ petitions and appeals challenging the Government Order dated 12 August 2008 that handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Devaru Temple, Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. The court examines the legality of the order under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, relevant endowments laws, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

11 Feb 2021

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Payment Order in License Fee Dispute — Sets Aside Direction to Pay Rs. 37.61 Lakhs Per Month Pending Trial. Court Holds That Order Under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC for Interim Payment Requires Admission of Liability or Undisputed Amounts, Not Determination of Disputed Claims.

1 Nov 2023

The Appellant, Kavis Fashions Private Limited, challenged an order dated 4 January 2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane, allowi...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)