Search Results for "new tenancy"

1020 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1020 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition in Tenancy Dispute — Purchase Price Fixed Under Section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy Act Is Final and Binding. Landlord's Challenge to Purchase Price and Tenancy Status Fails Due to Lack of Evidence and Delay.

The petitioner, the original landlord of agricultural land in Survey Nos. 15 and 16 of village Kurutanwadi, Taluka Chandgad, District Kolhapur, filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Forfeiture of Tenancy under Section 111(g) TPA Not Attracted When Tenant Claims Firm Tenancy Without Denying Landlord’s Title – Bombay High Court Restores Trial Court Decree in Second Appeal No. 81 of 2013 (2026)

The plaintiff filed a suit for possession, arrears of rent, and damages claiming that Late Mohd. Siddique was his tenant since 1960. Lat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase of Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court Upheld the Revenue Tribunal's Order Confirming the Tenant's Purchase, Finding No Error of Law or Fact.

The case involves a dispute between the petitioners (original applicants/landlords) and the respondents (original non-applicants/tenants) concerning a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant in Bombay Rent Act Suit for Default in Rent. Tenant's Conflicting Evidence and Failure to Deposit Rent During Appeal Disentitled Him to Relief Under Section 12(3).

The dispute arose from an eviction suit filed by the landlords (respondents) against their monthly tenant (petitioner) in the Small Causes Court at Pu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Restoration of Possession Cannot Be Ordered Without Hearing the Landlord Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, Kacharu B. Ambekar and others, are the successors-in-interest of the original landlord of agricultural lands bearing Gat No.333 (47 A...