High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition in Tenancy Succession Dispute — Rent Controller Directed to Conduct Inquiry into Inheritance of Tenancy Rights. The Court held that married daughters are entitled to inherit tenancy rights under Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968, and that the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide such questions.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA
  • 12
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, three married daughters of the late statutory tenant, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 02/05/2017 passed by the Rent Controller. The petitioners had moved an application before the Rent Controller seeking an inquiry into whether the two sons of the late statutory tenant had inherited any tenancy rights in the suit premises upon the death of the statutory tenant, in terms of Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 read with Rule 12(4) of the Rules framed thereunder. The Rent Controller dismissed the application, holding that it had no jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance. The petitioners contended that upon the death of the original statutory tenant, he was survived by his widow (the respondent), three married daughters (the petitioners), and two sons. The three daughters were married and living elsewhere. The legal issue was whether the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance of tenancy rights and whether married daughters are entitled to inherit such rights. The court analyzed the definition of 'tenant' under Section 2(o) of the Act, which includes the heirs of a deceased tenant. The court held that the Rent Controller has the jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry into whether the heirs have inherited tenancy rights, and that married daughters are not excluded from inheriting tenancy rights under the Act. The court set aside the order of the Rent Controller and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the Rent Controller to conduct an inquiry into the inheritance of tenancy rights, considering all heirs including the married daughters.

Headnote

A) Rent Control - Interpretation of 'tenant' - Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 - Succession of tenancy rights - The court considered whether the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance of tenancy rights upon the death of a statutory tenant. Held that the Rent Controller has the jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry into whether the heirs have inherited tenancy rights under Section 2(o) read with Rule 12(4) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1969. (Paras 1-10)

B) Rent Control - Rights of married daughters - Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 - Succession of tenancy rights - The court examined whether married daughters are entitled to inherit tenancy rights. Held that married daughters are not excluded from inheriting tenancy rights under the Act, and the Rent Controller must consider all heirs including married daughters. (Paras 11-15)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance of tenancy rights upon the death of a statutory tenant, and whether married daughters are entitled to inherit tenancy rights under Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 02/05/2017 of the Rent Controller, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration. The Rent Controller was directed to conduct an inquiry into the inheritance of tenancy rights, considering all heirs including the married daughters.

Law Points

  • Interpretation of 'tenant' under Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease
  • Rent and Eviction) Control Act
  • 1968
  • Succession of tenancy rights
  • Jurisdiction of Rent Controller
  • Rights of married daughters
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 118

WRIT PETITION NO.536 OF 2017

2019-01-29

NUTAN D. SARDESSAI, J.

Shri J.E. Coelho Pereira, Senior Advocate with Shri S. Karpe, Advocate for the Petitioners; Shri P.A. Kholkar, Advocate for the Respondents

Amira Abdul Razaq, Farha Abdul Razaq, Sadia A. Razaq

Smt. Lila S. Mahtani, Shri Umesh S. Mahtani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Rent Controller dismissing an application for inquiry into inheritance of tenancy rights.

Remedy Sought

The petitioners sought to set aside the Rent Controller's order and to direct an inquiry into whether the two sons of the late statutory tenant had inherited tenancy rights.

Filing Reason

The Rent Controller dismissed the petitioners' application for inquiry into inheritance of tenancy rights, holding that it had no jurisdiction.

Previous Decisions

The Rent Controller passed an order dated 02/05/2017 dismissing the application.

Issues

Whether the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance of tenancy rights upon the death of a statutory tenant. Whether married daughters are entitled to inherit tenancy rights under Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioners argued that the Rent Controller has jurisdiction to conduct an inquiry into inheritance of tenancy rights under Section 2(o) read with Rule 12(4). The respondents contended that the Rent Controller has no jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance.

Ratio Decidendi

The Rent Controller has jurisdiction to decide the question of inheritance of tenancy rights under Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968 read with Rule 12(4) of the Rules. Married daughters are not excluded from inheriting tenancy rights under the Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in the matter of interpretation of the expression 'tenant' in terms of Section 2(o) of the Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1908 and Rules 1969 framed thereunder. It was his contention that the petitioners had moved an application before the Court of the Rent Controller to conduct an inquiry whether the two sons of the late statutory tenant had inherited any tenancy rights in the suit premises in terms of Section 2(o) of the Act read with Rule 12(4) upon the death of the statutory tenant.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed an application before the Rent Controller seeking an inquiry into inheritance of tenancy rights. The Rent Controller dismissed the application on 02/05/2017. The petitioners then filed the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1968: 2(o), 21, 22
  • Goa Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Rules, 1969: 12(4)
  • Constitution of India: 227
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition in Tenancy Succession Dispute — Rent Controller Directed to Conduct Inquiry into Inheritance of Tenancy Rights. The Court held that married daughters are entitled to inherit tenancy rights under Sect...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Restoration of Appeal Dismissed for Default Under Order 41 Rule 19 CPC — Sufficient Cause Shown for Absence of Appellant and Advocate. Appellant's Explanation of Being Misled by Advocate Accepted as Sufficient Cause for Res...