Search Results for "lump sum payment"

378 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 378 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows State's Appeal in Contract Dispute Over Canal Excavation Work — Contractor's Claim for Payment for Work Done Partly Allowed. The court held that the contractor is entitled to payment for work actually done and measured, but the quantum must be proved by proper evidence.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Executive Engineer, P.W.D., Krishna Water Supply Project, against the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Concurrent Eviction Decrees for Rent Default and Denial of Title Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Irregular Rent Payments and Denial of Landlord's Title Justify Eviction Despite Absence of Formal Demand Notice.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the tenant (Dilip Jasaramji Mali) challenging the concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Sm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in Arbitration Dispute, Restoring Arbitral Award Modified by Lower Courts. Judicial Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is Limited, and Courts Cannot Re-appreciate Evidence or Modify Awards on Merits.

The dispute arose from a construction contract between a civil engineering contractor and the Karnataka State Public Works Department for building off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Nomination Papers for Rajya Sabha Elections. Filing of Nomination by Proposer Who is Not an Elector in the State Renders Nomination Invalid Under Section 33(1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioners, who were candidates for election to the Rajya Sabha from Karnataka, challenged the rejection of their nomination papers by the Return...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...