Search Results for "landlord's conduct"

660 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 660 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Eviction Decree in Bonafide Requirement Case — Landlord's Failure to Lead Personal Evidence Proves Fatal. Constituted Attorney's Evidence Held Insufficient to Prove Bonafide Requirement Under Section 115 CPC.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (tenants) against the judgment and decree of the appellate court confirming the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision in Eviction Suit Based on Bona Fide Requirement — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Subsequent Induction of New Tenant in Adjacent Shop Not Relevant as It Was Not Part of Suit Property.

The case involves a suit for eviction filed by the owners (plaintiffs) against the tenants (defendants) in respect of two shops, on the ground of bona...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Admitted a Batch of Appeals from Orders in Property-Related Disputes. The Specific Nature of the Dispute and the Court’s Directions Remain Unclear as the Judgment Text Was Truncated.

The judgment dated 12 December 2011 was delivered by Justice R.M. Borde of the High Court of Bombay (Civil Appellate Jurisdiction). The matter involve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Bona Fide Need of Landlord's Son. Eviction upheld under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 as landlord's son required the suit premises for his independent business.

The petitioner, M/s. Khandelwal Steel & Pipe Distributors, a partnership firm, was a tenant in a three-storied house property owned by the respondents...