Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2362 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2362 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

3 Sep 2025

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Refund of Court Fee Upon Withdrawal of Suit Under Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Court Fee Deposited at Time of Filing. The court held that the proviso to Order XXIII Rule 1(3) CPC mandates refund of court fee when a suit is withdrawn unconditionally, and the trial court's rejection of the refund application was erroneous.

19 Aug 2025

The petitioner, Bindu Balakrishna Patali, filed a suit (Com. O.S. 150/2024) before the LXXXIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Commercial Cou...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case — Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Security Deposit Refund. Cheques Issued for Refund of Security Deposit Under Lease Agreement Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt; Compensation Enhanced to Full Deposit Amount.

4 Mar 2025

The case arises from a lease-cum-rent agreement dated 12th May 2014 between the appellant-accused (landlord) and the respondent-complainant (tenant) f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Credit Amount Paid Under Income Declaration Scheme in Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Proceedings. Court Holds That Beneficial Legislation Must Be Interpreted Liberally and Non Obstante Clause Does Not Bar Credit for Prior Payments Under Earlier Scheme.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Pinnacle Vastunirman Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 (res...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contempt Case Over Refund of Excess Coal Price and Interest Rate Dispute. The court held that respondents must comply with High Court orders for refund and pay interest at 12% per annum as per Supreme Court precedent, not bank rate, under principles of contempt and restitution.

22 Feb 2024

The dispute originated from the appellant paying a higher price than the notified price in an e-auction for coal conducted by the respondent. After li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Income Tax Return for Refund Claim. CBDT's Rejection of Condonation Application Set Aside as Reasons for Delay Were Genuine and Not Habitual.

3 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Artist Tree Pvt. Ltd., engaged in dealing in artifacts and finances, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1997-1998 on 14 Sept...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Seigniorage Fee Paid Under Protest for Felled Trees on Granted Land. Payment under protest established by contemporaneous correspondence; limitation does not bar refund of illegal exaction.

28 Nov 2024

The petitioner, N Mahabaleshwar Bhat (since deceased, represented by legal heir Smt. Gayathry), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ITC on Export of Services, Quashes Rejection Order for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the rejection of refund claim without considering the petitioner's reply and without granting a personal hearing violated principles of natural justice under Section 75(4) of the CGST Act, 2017.

31 Jul 2023

The petitioner, Jacobs Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in providing engineering consulting services to its group entities located outside India....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST Paid on Exported Goods Despite Claim of Higher Drawback Rate. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST under Section 16(3)(b) of IGST Act read with Section 54 of CGST Act and Rule 96 of CGST Rules, as selection of higher drawback column does not disentitle refund.

26 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Kunal Housewares Private Limited, exported stainless steel household articles in July, August, and September 2017. The petitioner paid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of TDS Refund Under Section 264 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Assessee Failed to Establish That Payments to Foreign Collaborator Were Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) Read with DTAA.

28 Oct 2005

The petitioners, M/s BASF (India) Limited and Mr. P.A. Ramasamy, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28th February 2001 passed by the Co...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)