High Court of Judicature at Madras Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Former Temporary Staff Seeking Regularisation and Absorption — Petitioners Implead Registrar General, Labour Court, and District Judiciary as Respondents
9 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "extreme hardship"
168 result(s) found
Found 168 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Disqualification of Ex-Committee Members Under MCS Act. Failure to Furnish Minutes and Video Recording of AGM to Fellow Member Attracts Disqualification Under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
1 Jul 2026The petitioners, who were ex-members of the managing committee of Vaishali Nagar Mahalaxmi Co-operative Housing Society Limited, challenged their disq...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Interchange of Approval and Appointment of Assistant Teachers in Primary Schools — Violation of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules. The Court held that approval must precede appointment and cannot be backdated, quashing the Education Officer's orders.
17 Jun 2026The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by assistant teachers and a school management challenging the action of the Education Officer (Primary)...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Senior Advocate for Criminal Contempt in Gujarat High Court Case. Scandalous Allegations Against Judiciary and Registry Constitute Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c)(i) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
11 May 2026The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against the conviction of appellant, President of the Gujarat High Court Advocates' Association and a desig...
- 239
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.
1 Jan 2026The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Release of Passport Seized Under Section 10(3)(h) of Passports Act, 1967 — Petitioner, a Nurse Working in Yemen, Had Passport Withheld on Allegation of Human Trafficking, Court Finds No Prima Facie Case and Orders Return of Passport.
4 Jun 2024The petitioner, Shany Jose, a qualified nurse with a Diploma in General Nursing and Midwifery, worked in Yemen from February 2011 at various hospitals...
- 211
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer Order of Chief Engineer in MSETCL for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy. Transfer of Employee Mid-Academic Year Without Considering Family Circumstances Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Departmental Transfer Guidelines.
24 Nov 2017The petitioner, Sanjay Tulshiram Shinde, a Chief Engineer with Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd. (MSETCL), challenged an office orde...
- 162
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Arbitral Tribunal Cannot Appoint Court Receiver Under Section 17 of Arbitration Act. Court Receiver is an Officer of the High Court Subject Only to Chief Justice's Supervision.
16 Mar 2017The Court Receiver, High Court, Bombay filed a Report seeking directions on whether the Registry should accept matters where an Arbitral Tribunal appo...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Remand Order in Partnership Dispute — Unregistered Partnership Bar Under Section 69(2A) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Applies to Suit for Accounts and Dissolution. The court held that the trial court must frame and decide the preliminary issue of maintainability under Section 69(2A) before proceeding with the suit.
11 Jul 2011The appeal arose from a suit filed by the plaintiff (Respondent No.1) against the defendants (Appellants) seeking accounts and dissolution of an unreg...
- 67
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Overtaking Bus Driver Established. The court held that the Tribunal erred in rejecting the claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the evidence clearly showed that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the respondent's bus driver.
17 Jun 2011The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents of the deceased Nitin Chari, who died in a road accident on 24.06.1999. The deceased ...
- 170
