Search Results for "depreciation allowance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "depreciation allowance"

118 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 118 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Provision for Unascertained Liabilities is Invalid.

26 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016, declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid Under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 as Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Was Full and True Disclosure.

26 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 29 November 2016 declaring total income of Rs. 4,860,25,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Material Facts in Return of Income. The court held that the reopening was based on a change of opinion and was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not form a reasonable belief of escapement of income.

7 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Astec LifeSciences Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of agrochemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates. Wi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 10B — CIT Cannot Revise Assessment Under Section 263 Without Proper Inquiry. The court held that the Commissioner must record satisfaction that the assessment order is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue, and mere lack of discussion does not make it erroneous if the Assessing Officer has made due inquiries.

2 Nov 2020

The case involves two tax appeals filed by Sesa Starlite Limited (formerly Sesa Goa Ltd.) against the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) concerning the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 12% per annum. Arbitrator's Award of Interest at 18% Held to be Excessive and Not in Accordance with Contractual Stipulation of 12% under Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2019

The case involves an arbitration petition filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Petitioner) challenging an arbitral award passed by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Award on Compensation for Delay but Sets Aside Award of Interest on Mobilisation Advance. Arbitrator's findings on delay and compensation held plausible, but interest on mobilisation advance contrary to contract terms under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2019

The case arises from a construction contract between the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Petitioner) and S.N. Thakkar Construction Company Pr...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

25 Mar 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against ord...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)