Search Results for "demand verification"

950 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 950 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Cheque Was Issued as Security, Not for Repayment of Loan.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Vyomesh Jitendra Trivedi, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Conviction of EPFO Official for Bribery Under Prevention of Corruption Act; Validity of Sanction and Proof of Demand Analyzed. Court Considers Whether Sanction Order Was Granted After Proper Application of Mind and Whether Accused Actually Demanded the Bribe.

The appellant, a former Senior Social Security Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Regional Office, Bengaluru, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment in Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Recovery of Money Alleging Bank's Unauthorized Issuance of Demand Drafts from Cheque Mandate. The Appeal Involves Issues of Bank's Liability for Acting Contrary to Instructions Under Sections of Customs Act, 1962 and CPC.

The plaintiff, a registered company engaged in manufacturing television and monitor components, imported goods and stored them in a bonded warehouse. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Delayed Notice Beyond 30 Days Under Section 138 NI Act. Notice Posted on 31st Day from Bank Intimation Fails to Meet Mandatory Requirement of 'Giving Notice' Within 30 Days.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the accused, Shivnath Suryoba Gaonkar, challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appeal Pertains to Alleged Bribery Demand by State Excise Superintendent for Renewing Liquor License.

The matter involved a criminal appeal under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, filed by a Superintendent of the State Excise Department at Ratnag...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ambadas Devram Chavan, was convicted by the Special Judge (Anti-Corruption), Pune for offences under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) rea...