Search Results for "controlling interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "controlling interest"

551 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 551 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty on Cancelled Development Agreement Under Section 47(c)(5) of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner entitled to refund as transaction was cancelled before possession and within two years, not covered by Section 48 proviso.

3 Sep 2025

The Petitioner, M/s. Satyam Construction, entered into a Development Agreement on 2 June 2011 with Shri Rajiv Ghule and others for development of land...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Gratuity Award for Non-Prosecution. Central Warehousing Corporation failed to appear or file objections, leading to dismissal of petition under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India challenging order under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

10 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Central Warehousing Corporation, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court o...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

8 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging PF Assessment Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Petitioner failed to avail statutory appeal under Section 7I of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, and no exceptional grounds were made out to bypass the remedy.

3 Sep 2019

The petitioner, M/s Balaji Ginning Factory, challenged an order dated 25.09.2014 passed under Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misappropriation by Bank Employee — Wilful Misconduct Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Justifies Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity. The court held that misappropriation of funds by a bank employee constitutes wilful misconduct involving moral turpitude, and the employer is entitled to forfeit the entire gratuity under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

14 Jun 2018

The petitioner, an ex-employee of the respondent bank, was terminated on 6 July 1996 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award — Delay in Filing Application Not Barred Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Limitation Under Section 7(7) Applies Only to Appeals, Not to Original Applications for Gratuity.

26 Feb 2015

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Cooperative Tribal Development Corporation Ltd. and its officers, challenged the order of the Controlling Autho...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

11 Nov 2014

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Principal. Teacher/Principal Held to Be 'Employee' Under Section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Following Supreme Court Precedent.

21 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Vidarbha Youth Welfare Institution (Society), challenged the judgment and order dated 29-5-2010 passed by the Controlling Authority un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award in Public Trust Case. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 applies to public trusts registered under Bombay Public Trust Act, and establishment coverage depends on employing more than ten employees.

18 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Amravati Nagar Vachanalaya, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, challenged the order of the Additional Commis...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)