Search Results for "contractual insurance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "contractual insurance"

598 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 598 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deemed Owner's Liability Under Section 163-A MV Act. The court held that the insurer is liable to pay compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased occupant of a jeep under Section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, as the owner of the vehicle is deemed to be the insured and the policy covers all occupants.

18 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 19.02.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Considers Insurance Company and Claimant Appeals Against MACT Award Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act. Dispute Centers on Maximum Compensation Payable for Deceased Motorcycle Rider and Pillion Rider's Death.

1 Oct 2020

Background: The appeals arose from two motor accident claim petitions filed under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accide...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim and Fixes Liability on Insurance Company in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant sustained grievous injuries due to driver's negligence; Insurance Company held liable as no evidence of invalid license.

2 Dec 2020

The case involves an appeal filed by the claimant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.06...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Despite Absence of Driving License Evidence — Insurance Company Liable to Pay and Recover from Owner. The Court directed the Insurance Company to pay the awarded compensation to the claimants and then recover the same from the owner of the vehicle under Section 149(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

1 Jun 2026

The appeal was filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. challenging the award dated 16.02.2018 passed by the XV Additional Small Causes Judge & Member...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Owner and Insurer Jointly Liable for Compensation. Tribunal's apportionment of liability between owner and insurer set aside; insurer directed to pay entire compensation with right to recover from owner due to breach of policy conditions.

12 Dec 2005

This judgment arises from three appeals against a common order dated 31/3/1987 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. The appeals were filed by...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

4 Mar 2015

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim; Holds Insurer Liable to Pay and Recover for Violation of Policy Condition Regarding Hazardous Goods Endorsement. The Court Reassessed Compensation Applying the Principle of Pay and Recover and Enhanced Amounts Under Loss of Dependency and Conventional Heads.

16 Jun 2020

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim filed by the widow, parents, and minor daughter of the deceased B.S. Thippeswamy. On 2 July 2012, the dec...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeals, Upholding Arbitral Award Against Project Owner in Construction Dispute. Project Owner Bound by Arbitration Clause Though Non-Signatory, Owing to Active Participation and Common Intention Under Cox and Kings Principle.

3 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court considered three appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a construction contract dis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Restrain Bank Guarantees in Construction Contract Dispute. Court holds that invocation of bank guarantees cannot be injuncted except in cases of fraud or irretrievable injustice, and no such case was made out.

2 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd., filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim reli...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Dispute Over Indemnity Timing Under Consent Award. The Court held that an indemnity clause in a consent award creates immediate obligations to protect against liability recovery, not deferred until final confirmation by the highest court of appeal, under Sections 124 and 125 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 and Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Apr 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Delhi that deferred the execution of a consent award dated 01.03.2019, rendered by the Singapore...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)