Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "compensation under 2013 Act"

3707 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3707 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

10 Sep 2024

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree Holder's Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Interest Dispute — Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Held Payable from Date of Possession, Not Notification Under Section 4(1). The court clarified that Section 28 explicitly provides for interest from the date of possession, and the executing court's contrary view was erroneous.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioners, M.V. Subba Rao and M.M.G. Prasad, were owners of land in Singapore Village, Sindhanoor Taluk, Raichur District, which was acquired fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.

27 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...

High Court

KAHC010259352010_1

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compounding Application in SEBI Act Case, Overturning Lower Court Decisions on Consent Requirement. Court Holds That Section 24A of Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 Does Not Mandate SEBI's Consent for Compounding, and Compounding Can Be Considered at Advanced Trial Stages Based on Factual Assessment.

23 Jul 2021

The dispute arose from a criminal prosecution under Section 24(1) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, against the appellant, a di...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.

20 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)