Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Order on Non-Arbitrability. Disputes Relating to Termination for Convenience and Non-Compete Obligations Held Not Arbitrable Under Section 16 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Capalpha Trade Private Limited, filed a commercial arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by State Undertaking in BOT Arbitration Dispute, Upholds Arbitral Award on Termination Payment. Court Reiterates Limited Scope of Judicial Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Emphasizing Finality of Arbitral Awards.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MPRDC) against the judgment of the Madhya Pradesh Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Arbitration Application and Petition for Interim Measures in Partnership Dispute Over Commercial Project. No Arbitration Agreement Found in Memorandum of Understanding Dated 16 October 2017 Under Sections 9 and 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Thus Relief Denied.

The dispute arose from a partnership firm, Respondents, involved in developing 'Ventura Commercial Hub'. The petitioner, was admitted as a partner in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Joint Venture Dispute — Arbitration Clause Survives Termination of Agreement. Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked for disputes arising from Joint Venture Agreement dated 28th March, 2007.

The applicant, M/s. Atul & Arkade Realty, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Exclusive jurisdiction clause in agreement conferred jurisdiction on Hyderabad courts, not Bombay High Court.

The petitioner, Aniket SA Investments LLC, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim measures pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Clause 32 of Work Order Held to Contain Valid Arbitration Agreement Despite Ambiguous Wording.

The applicant, M/s. Jay Bhagwati Construction Co., a partnership firm, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition and Appoints Arbitrator Despite Stamp Duty Objection. Court holds that existence of arbitration agreement is a prima facie matter at Section 11 stage, and stamp duty is for arbitrator to decide.

The Petitioner, Coastal Marine Construction and Engineering Limited, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Parties to Arbitration in Commercial Dispute Over Unpaid Goods. Arbitration Clause in Purchase Orders Held Binding Despite Absence of Signed Agreement, as Parties Acted on Purchase Orders Containing Arbitration Clause.

The petitioners, Sai Wardha Power Ltd. and its directors, were original defendants in a civil suit filed by the respondent, M/s. Goyal Dhatu Udyog Pvt...