Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3584 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3584 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Limitation Issues in Suit for Declaration and Injunction by Hereditary Temple Worshippers. The Court Examines Whether Ouster by Trustees Constitutes a Continuing Wrong Under Section 23 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908.

26 Mar 1959

The dispute arose from the Shree Dnyaneshwar Maharaj Sansthan at Alandi, where the appellants, known as Guravs, were hereditary worshippers claiming o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Execution Petition as Time-Barred in Specific Performance Case. Dismissal of Appeal for Want of Prosecution Does Not Constitute Merger of Decree and Limitation Period Runs from Date of Trial Court Decree Absent Stay of Execution.

9 Jun 2025

The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land. The predecessor of the petitioners (plaintiff) had e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint and Impleadment of Parties in Property Dispute — Amendment Sought Before Commencement of Trial Allowed as No Prejudice Caused. Order VI Rule 17 CPC permits liberal amendment before trial; impleadment under Order I Rule 10 CPC allowed for complete adjudication.

1 Aug 2014

The plaintiffs, Sharayu Ramkrishna Mhatre and Anjali Deepak Karnik, filed a suit (Suit No. 1964 of 2012) in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaratio...

High Court

KAHC010062672020_1

16 Mar 2023

This regular second appeal arose from a dispute concerning agricultural land bearing Sy.No.10/1 measuring 2 acres 3 guntas at Kundarasanahalli Village...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC in Suit for Declaration and Specific Performance -- Applicant Application Rejected, Anil Hariprasad Jejani's Suit to Proceed

10 Feb 2026

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed Civil Revision Application No.117 of 2025 filed by Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (applicant/d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case — Petition Under Section 7 IBC Held Time-Barred Despite IRP's Admission of Claim Not Constituting Acknowledgment Under Limitation Act. The Court held that limitation for Section 7 IBC runs from NPA date, and IRP's admission of claim is administrative, not an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

27 Mar 2026

The appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) were filed by Appellant, erstwhile Director of two corporate debtors, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Multi Commodity Exchange in Recovery Suit — Limitation Runs from Declaration of Defaulter Under Exchange Rules. Suit for recovery of membership dues filed within three years of declaring member as defaulter on 8 March 2018 is within limitation, reversing trial court's dismissal.

13 Mar 2025

The appellant, Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd. (MCX), filed a Commercial First Appeal against the judgment dated 8 March 2022 of the City Civil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Rejecting Counterclaims as Time-Barred. Court holds that limitation for counterclaims arising from same transaction as main claim is governed by Article 1 of Limitation Act, 1963, and that the arbitral tribunal erred in applying a strict three-year period from the date of termination without considering the continuing breach and the date of final bill.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Rolta India Limited, filed two arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Execution of Foreign Decree Case, Holding Limitation Period of 12 Years Runs from Date of Foreign Decree. Bank of Baroda's Execution Petition Filed 14 Years After London Decree Held Time-Barred Under Article 136 of Limitation Act, 1963.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute between Bank of Baroda (appellant) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. (respondent, successor of Vysya Bank) regarding the limita...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)