Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

Trending :

Search Results for "cadre and recruitment rules"

599 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 599 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM Petition Against Union Recognition in Industrial Dispute. Court upholds Industrial Court's finding that petitioner failed to prove loss of majority support by respondent union under Section 22 of Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946.

10 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Engineers Seeking Employment with MSEB Holding Co. Ltd. — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Vacant Posts. The court held that the respondents must consider the petitioners for appointment against available or future vacancies in a fair and transparent manner, as the action of not appointing selected candidates without valid reason is arbitrary.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioners, nine individuals who were selected as Assistant Engineers by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Holding Co. Ltd., filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Assistant Engineers Seeking Employment with MSEB Holding Co. Ltd. — Directs Consideration of Candidature for Vacant Posts. The court held that selected candidates have a right to be considered for appointment against available vacancies, and the respondents cannot arbitrarily deny appointment.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioners, nine individuals who were selected as Assistant Engineers by the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) Holding Co. Ltd., filed a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Filed Against Transfer Order as Petitioner Lacked Eligibility Under Cadre and Recruitment Rules. Strict Compliance with Karnataka Minorities Welfare Services (Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, 2010 Required for Appointment as Director, and Transfer Without Vacancy Constitutes Legal Malafide.

31 May 2022

The writ petition was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Three Writ Petitions Challenging Government Orders and Lokayukta Charge Memoes in Basava Vasati Housing Scheme Scam Case. Court Examines Legality of Disciplinary Proceedings Under Karnataka Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1957 and Lokayukta Act, 1984.

23 Jul 2021

Three writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka by retired engineers of Karnataka Rural Infrastructure Development Limited (KRIDL),...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Departmental Promotees — Rules That Date of Selection, Not Appointment, Determines Seniority Under Rule 27 of Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Services Rules, 1975. The Court found that the department deliberately accelerated the DP recruitment process to give them an unfair advantage, which was mala fide and impermissible.

24 Jan 2020

The case involved a dispute over seniority between direct recruits (DRs) and departmental promotees (DPs) for the post of Tax Assistants in the Rajast...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Selection Process for Technical Assistant Posts. Revision of Category-Wise Vacancies After Written Examination Does Not Change Rules of the Game When Done to Fulfill Reservation Mandates.

30 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a High Court judgment that quashed the selection process for 6628 posts of Technical Assistant (Group-C) in th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Punjab State Power Corporation in Pay Parity Dispute Between Head Clerks and Internal Auditors. Internal Auditors Not Entitled to Same Pay Scale as Head Clerks Due to Different Recruitment, Duties, and Promotional Avenues.

8 Jan 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Punjab State Power Corporation Limited (appellant) and Rajesh Kumar Jindal and others (respondents), who are I...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 24(6-A) CrPC Allowing Appointment of Private Advocates as Public Prosecutors in High Court — Provision Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory Against Government Prosecutors. The court held that the amendment does not violate Articles 14, 16, or 21 of the Constitution and that the State has the discretion to appoint any advocate for conducting cases in the High Court.

25 Jul 2017

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association and several individual Assistant/Additional Public Prosecutors working in the co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds State's Power to Appoint CEOs Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishads Rules, 2014 — Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointments Quashed. The court held that the appointments were valid under Rule 4 of the Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis (Appointment of Chief Executive Officer) Rules, 2014 and the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction.

27 Dec 2016

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions and civil applications challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT) which set ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)