Search Results for "bonus settlement"

132 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Reference in Industrial Dispute Against Minority School — Lack of Jurisdiction Under Industrial Disputes Act. School Employee's Dispute Not an 'Industrial Dispute' as School is Not an 'Industry' Under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Amalorpavam Higher Secondary School, an unaided private minority school recognized under the National Commission for Minority Educatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State's Petition Challenging NCLT Order De-freezing MPID Attached Accounts. MPID Act Overrides IBC for Attachment and Confiscation of Properties of Financial Establishments.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Deputy Collector and Competent Authority (NSEL), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Fixed-Term Security Guard in Saudi Arabian Airlines Case. Fixed-term employment found to be a camouflage to deny permanency benefits under MRTU & PULP Act.

The appellant, Saudi Arabian Airlines, engaged the respondent workman as a Security Guard on a fixed-term contract from 1st October 1989 for two years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Share Delivery — Respondent's Opposition on Grounds of Hardship Not Sustained. Court Permits Withdrawal Without Prejudice to Respondent's Rights Under the Award and Pending Proceedings.

The present appeal was filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a judgment of a Single Judge dated 2 February...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...