Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Auction Sale Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act — Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Set Aside Sale After Confirmation and Payment. Court Held That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Title Passes, the Sale Cannot Be Set Aside Merely Because of Irregularities, and the Remedy of the Judgment Debtor Is to Claim Damages, Not to Annul the Sale.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 40
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by auction purchasers and judgment debtors challenging the auction sale of a sugar factory conducted under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The petitioner in WP 12835/2016, Ambarwadikar Industries Pvt. Ltd., was the auction purchaser of the sugar factory of Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. (respondent no.1), which was under liquidation. The auction was conducted by the Liquidator and confirmed by the Commissioner of Sugar. The sale certificate was issued and the petitioner paid the full consideration. Subsequently, the judgment debtor (respondent no.1) and other creditors filed objections before the Co-operative Court and also filed writ petitions challenging the sale on grounds of irregularities, including inadequate price and non-compliance with rules. The High Court examined the scheme of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the Rules framed thereunder, particularly the provisions relating to attachment and sale of property. The Court held that once the sale is confirmed and the sale certificate is issued, the title passes to the auction purchaser and the sale cannot be set aside merely on grounds of irregularities. The remedy of the judgment debtor is to claim damages, if any, from the liquidator or the society, but not to annul the sale. The Court further held that the Co-operative Court has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of such sales under Section 91 of the Act, and the Civil Court or the High Court under Article 226 cannot interfere with the sale after confirmation. The Court dismissed all the writ petitions, including the one filed by the auction purchaser seeking to set aside the sale on the ground that the property was not free from encumbrances. The Court also dismissed the civil application for intervention filed by State Bank of India. The Court directed that the auction purchaser is entitled to possession of the property and the sale certificate stands confirmed.

Headnote

A) Co-operative Law - Auction Sale - Confirmation of Sale - Once sale is confirmed and sale certificate is issued, title passes to the auction purchaser and the sale cannot be set aside merely on grounds of irregularities; the remedy of the judgment debtor is to claim damages, not to annul the sale. (Paras 10-15)

B) Co-operative Law - Jurisdiction - Exclusive Jurisdiction of Co-operative Court - Disputes arising out of auction sales under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 are to be adjudicated by the Co-operative Court under Section 91 of the Act, and not by the Civil Court or by way of writ petition under Article 226. (Paras 16-20)

C) Co-operative Law - Recovery of Dues - Attachment and Sale of Property - The procedure for attachment and sale of property under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 is a complete code in itself, and the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) are not applicable. (Paras 21-25)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is maintainable to challenge an auction sale conducted under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 after the sale has been confirmed and the sale certificate issued, and whether the sale can be set aside on grounds of irregularities after confirmation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

All writ petitions and civil application are dismissed. The auction sale stands confirmed and the auction purchaser is entitled to possession of the property.

Law Points

  • Auction sale confirmed and title passed cannot be set aside
  • Remedy for judgment debtor is damages
  • Not annulment of sale
  • Section 103 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act
  • 1960
  • Order XXI Rule 90 CPC inapplicable
  • Co-operative Court has exclusive jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018:BHC-AS:10334

Writ Petition No.12835 of 2016 with Civil Application No.2994 of 2017, Writ Petition No.10658 of 2016, Writ Petition No.10899 of 2016

2018-04-06

2018:BHC-AS:10334

Ambarwadikar Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Karmaveer Kakasaheb Wagh Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging auction sale of a sugar factory conducted under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

Remedy Sought

The auction purchaser sought to set aside the sale on the ground that the property was not free from encumbrances; the judgment debtor and other creditors sought to set aside the sale on grounds of irregularities.

Filing Reason

The auction sale was challenged by the judgment debtor and other creditors on grounds of irregularities, and by the auction purchaser on the ground that the property was not free from encumbrances.

Previous Decisions

The auction sale was confirmed by the Commissioner of Sugar and the sale certificate was issued. The Co-operative Court had not yet decided the objections.

Issues

Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable to challenge an auction sale after confirmation and issuance of sale certificate? Whether the sale can be set aside on grounds of irregularities after confirmation? Whether the Co-operative Court has exclusive jurisdiction over disputes arising out of auction sales under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act?

Submissions/Arguments

The auction purchaser argued that the property was not free from encumbrances and therefore the sale should be set aside. The judgment debtor argued that the sale was conducted with irregularities, including inadequate price and non-compliance with rules. The respondents (liquidator and Commissioner) argued that the sale was validly conducted and confirmed, and the writ petitions are not maintainable.

Ratio Decidendi

Once an auction sale is confirmed and the sale certificate is issued, title passes to the auction purchaser and the sale cannot be set aside merely on grounds of irregularities. The remedy of the judgment debtor is to claim damages, not to annul the sale. The Co-operative Court has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 to adjudicate disputes arising out of such sales.

Judgment Excerpts

Once the sale is confirmed and the sale certificate is issued, the title passes to the auction purchaser and the sale cannot be set aside merely on grounds of irregularities. The remedy of the judgment debtor is to claim damages, if any, from the liquidator or the society, but not to annul the sale. The Co-operative Court has exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes arising out of such sales under Section 91 of the Act.

Procedural History

The auction sale was conducted by the Liquidator of respondent no.1 under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The sale was confirmed by the Commissioner of Sugar. The auction purchaser paid the full consideration and the sale certificate was issued. Thereafter, the judgment debtor and other creditors filed objections before the Co-operative Court and also filed writ petitions in the High Court challenging the sale. The auction purchaser also filed a writ petition seeking to set aside the sale. The High Court heard all matters together and dismissed them.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960: Section 91, Section 103
  • Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961:
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXI Rule 90
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Auction Sale Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act — Auction Purchaser Not Entitled to Set Aside Sale After Confirmation and Payment. Court Held That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Title Pas...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Evidence Act Case — Bailiff's Report Held Public Document Under Section 74. Certified Copy Admissible Under Section 77, But Trial Court Must Give Opportunity to Rebut Contents.