Search Results for "bone deep injury"

503 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 503 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by accused nos.1, 3, and 4 against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and other sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Partly Allows Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, Alters to Section 304 Part I IPC. Conviction Altered on Ground That Assault Occurred in Sudden Fight Without Premeditation, Attracting Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC.

This criminal appeal was filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Majalgaon, convicting the appellants (original accused...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness was a close relative with material contradictions and lack of corroboration.

The appellants, Gulab, Sunil, Kamal, Amol, and Durgabai, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Case No.65/2017. Gulab a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 504, 506 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to three criminal appeals arising from a single incident of assault resulting in the death of one person and injuries to others....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC Sustained as Part of Unlawful Assembly with Common Object to Kill.

The appellant, Santosh Kantilal Kharva, was convicted by the Special Judge (CBI), Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 666 of 2011 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole dying declaration was not recorded in proper question-answer form and lacked corroboration.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the 3rd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Mumbai, for the murder of Mohammad Rafiq under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder Conviction Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for stabbing death confirmed as prosecution proved guilt beyond reasonable doubt through credible eyewitnesses and consistent medical evidence.

The appellant, Sagar Shankar Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Babu @ Rajesh Ganesh Gupta under Sectio...