Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC Sustained as Part of Unlawful Assembly with Common Object to Kill.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Santosh Kantilal Kharva, was convicted by the Special Judge (CBI), Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 666 of 2011 for offences under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and sentenced to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.2,500/-. The case arose from an incident on 10th June 2011 at about 9:15 p.m. near Shivneri Seva Mandal, Bhatwadi, Ghatkopar, Mumbai. The informant (PW-1) and his friend Mangesh Ghadge (deceased) were present at the spot when the appellant along with four others (accused Nos.2 to 5) arrived. The appellant allegedly had a motive due to a prior quarrel with the deceased. The appellant inflicted a knife blow on the deceased's chest, while the other accused assaulted him with sticks and fists. The deceased died on the spot. The trial court convicted the appellant but acquitted the other four accused. The appellant appealed against his conviction. The Bombay High Court heard the appeal and examined the evidence, including the testimonies of PW-1 (informant) and PW-2 (another eyewitness), who consistently identified the appellant as the person who stabbed the deceased. The medical evidence (PW-8, doctor) confirmed the cause of death as hemorrhagic shock due to a stab injury on the chest. The court found that the appellant's individual role was clearly established, and the acquittal of co-accused did not affect his conviction. The court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Unlawful Assembly - Common Object - Sections 302, 149, 147 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction based on consistent eyewitness testimony and medical evidence - The appellant was convicted for murder as part of an unlawful assembly with common object to kill the deceased - The court upheld the conviction, finding that the eyewitnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) consistently identified the appellant as the assailant who inflicted a fatal knife blow on the deceased, and the medical evidence corroborated the cause of death as hemorrhagic shock due to stab injury - The acquittal of co-accused did not affect the appellant's conviction as his individual role was clearly established (Paras 1-20).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 147 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 147 IPC are upheld.

Law Points

  • Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC
  • Section 147 IPC
  • Common object
  • Unlawful assembly
  • Eyewitness testimony
  • Medical evidence
  • Motive
  • Acquittal of co-accused
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2024 LawText (BOM) (01) 150

Criminal Appeal No. 804 of 2015

2024-01-05

A. S. Gadkari, Shyam C. Chandak

Mr. Vaibhav A. Sugdare (for Appellant), Mr. J. P. Yagnik (for Respondent-State)

Santosh Kantilal Kharva

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder and unlawful assembly.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to set aside the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial court.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 147 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant and acquitted accused Nos.2 to 5.

Issues

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and Section 147 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued that the evidence was insufficient and that the acquittal of co-accused should benefit the appellant. Respondent's counsel argued that the eyewitness testimony and medical evidence clearly established the appellant's guilt.

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction of the appellant is sustainable as the eyewitnesses consistently identified him as the assailant who inflicted the fatal knife blow, and the medical evidence corroborated the cause of death. The acquittal of co-accused does not affect the appellant's conviction as his individual role was clearly established.

Judgment Excerpts

Appellant, original accused No.1 has questioned the correctness of Judgment and Order dated 19th December 2014, passed by the learned Special Judge (CBI), Greater Mumbai, in Sessions Case No. 666 of 2011, convicting him under Section 302 read with Section 149 and under Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code...

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellant on 19th December 2014. The appellant filed Criminal Appeal No. 804 of 2015 before the Bombay High Court, which was heard and dismissed on 5th January 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 149, 147
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Unlawful Assembly Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence. Appellant's Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC Sustained as Part of U...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal Against Waiver of Sheriff's Poundage in Admiralty Suit — Sheriff Entitled to Poundage Even if Warrant Not Executed. Court Holds That Sheriff's Right to Poundage Accrues on Issuance of Warrant of Arrest, Not I...