Search Results for "article 142 directions"

922 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 922 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Salt Land Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 4(2) of Salt Act, 1882. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Salt Commissioner Precludes Civil Court from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession of Salt Land.

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which confirmed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Pay and Recover Direction in Goods Vehicle Accident Case. Insurer directed to pay compensation to legal heirs of deceased gratuitous passengers and recover from owner for breach of policy terms.

The case arises from a motor vehicle accident on 20.7.1996 involving a matador (MP-28/B-0340) which, due to reckless driving, caused fatal injuries to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Appeal in Divorce Case Due to Procedural Irregularities. Family Court Decree Set Aside for Failure to Frame Issues and Denial of Opportunity to Lead Evidence.

The appellant-husband challenged the judgment and decree dated 24th April 2015 passed by the Family Court at Bandra, Mumbai in Petition No. A-869 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Discharges Respondents in Suo Motu Criminal Contempt for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Court holds that mere breach of undertaking does not constitute criminal contempt unless it scandalizes or lowers authority of court.

The High Court of Bombay initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against respondent no.1 (M.N. Navale, President of Sinhgad Technical Educati...