Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitrator substitution"

209 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 209 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Time Extension Dispute — Holds Application Under Section 29A(5) Can Be Filed After Expiry of Arbitral Tribunal's Mandate. The court resolved the conflict among High Courts by interpreting Section 29A(4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to permit post-expiry extension applications, overruling the Calcutta High Court's decision in Rohan Builders.

1 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed a significant conflict among High Courts regar...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where parties have agreed on a procedure for appointment of arbitrator, the court must respect it unless bias or failure is shown.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award for Sand Removal Contract Dispute. The court held that the arbitrator's interpretation of contractual terms was plausible and not perverse, and the award did not violate public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

7 Jan 2021

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against an order of the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

7 Nov 2025

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Matter, Restores Arbitral Award. Court holds that Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, does not permit reappreciation of evidence or substitution of the arbitrator's view, and the Single Judge exceeded jurisdiction by setting aside the award on merits.

14 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment dated 29th July 2015, whereby the learn...

High Court

High Court of Bombay addresses the legal effect of unilateral arbitrator appointments made prior to 23 October 2015 in light of the 2015 amendment to the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court examines whether such appointments are void ab initio and the jurisdiction of the executing court to entertain challenges at the execution stage.

4 Aug 2026

The judgment concerns a reference from the Executing Court in a batch of execution applications filed by M/s. S. E. Investments Ltd. (now Paisalo Digi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

12 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons to Set Aside Abatement of Arbitration Petition and Condonation of Delay. Application Filed Under Order 22 Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Parties on Record.

15 Feb 2013

The Chamber Summons was filed under Order 22 Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to set aside the abatement of Arbitration Petition N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Award for Extra Items and Prolongation Costs Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that Clause 12 of Central Conditions of Contract does not bar extra item claims and that the Arbitrator's rate fixation based on comparable contracts was justified.

9 Oct 2012

The Union of India, represented by the Executive Engineer of the Central Public Works Department, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of th...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)