Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "arbitration mandate extension"

230 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 230 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Case Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Award of Rs.1,26,46,303/- with Interest at 12% Per Annum. The court held that the arbitrator had applied his mind and there was no violation of natural justice or public policy.

23 Dec 2025

The case involves a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Manmohan Bhimsen Goyal and Kavita Manmohan Goyal ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Restoration of Majority Award on Escalation Clause Interpretation. Section 30 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 Not Attracted as Arbitral Interpretation of Contract Clause Was Plausible.

5 Apr 2006

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court setting aside a majority arbitral award under Section 30 of the Arbi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petitions in Loan Dispute — Appoints Sole Arbitrator for IIFL Finance Disputes. Court finds that disputes arising from loan agreements containing arbitration clauses are arbitrable and appoints a retired judge as sole arbitrator.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed by DS Textiles, Madhuram Fabrics Pvt Ltd, and P R Packing Service against IIFL Finance Limited...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears civil miscellaneous petition seeking termination of existing arbitral tribunal and appointment of independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute arises from a works contract where the contractor sought replacement of the arbitrator appointed by the department on grounds of bias and non-compliance with disclosure requirements.

11 Aug 2022

The petitioner, a contractor, was awarded a works contract by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) for construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Director’s Challenge to Arbitral Award in Factoring Facility Dispute — Upholds Award Despite Claims of Forged Guarantee and Procedural Lapses. Arbitral Tribunal’s Award Allowing SBI Global Factors’ Claim of Rs.43.45 Crores Jointly and Severally Against Guarantor and Principal Debtor Not Found Patent Illegality Under Section 34.

23 Dec 2025

This judgment relates to a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Sanjeev Malhotra, a former director and sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Dispute Due to Invalid Unilateral Appointment Clause. Clause 56 of the agreement providing for appointment of arbitrator by the Architect, an employee of the respondent, is invalid under Section 12(5) read with Schedule 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Dec 2022

The applicant, M/s. Kay Vee Enterprises, a construction company, entered into a contract with the respondent, Shri Guru Gobind Singhji Institute of En...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Sub-Brokerage Dispute — Upholds Appellate Bench Decision of Bombay Stock Exchange. Court holds that findings of fact by arbitral tribunal and appellate bench are not liable to be interfered with under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 unless perverse or contrary to public policy.

9 Oct 2012

The petitioner, M/s. Actal, a sole proprietorship concern engaged in trading in shares, insurance, bonds, mutual funds, etc., was associated with the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

8 Jan 2013

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Appeal Against Vacation of Stay on Bank Guarantee Invocation. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, granting stay on invocation of performance bank guarantees, cannot be vacated solely on the ground of balance of convenience when there is a serious dispute regarding the underlying contract and the invocation is alleged to be fraudulent.

10 Sep 2025

The appellant, M/s. Pinnacle Teleservices Pvt. Ltd., filed an arbitration appeal against the order dated 27-08-2024 passed by the learned District Jud...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)