Search Results for "aggregate court fee"

247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Guarantee Money Paid to Non-Resident Cricket Boards for Matches Played in India. Income from matches held in India is deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attracting TDS under Section 194E.

The case concerns an appeal by PILCOM (PAK-INDO-LANKA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE), a committee formed by the cricket boards of Pakistan, India, and Sr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Petitions Under National Highways Act — Held That Reference Court Must Consider Market Value Based on Sale Deeds and Potential of Land, Not Merely Government Rates. Claimants Entitled to Additional Amounts Under Land Acquisition Act.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by legal heirs of deceased landowners whose agricultural lands were acquired for the construction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes Cross Appeals from Trial Court's Injunction Order in Suit for Demolition and CRZ Declaration; Construction in CRZ Not Entitled to Completion Certificate Though Demolition Restrained When Built Per Sanctioned Plan.

The dispute arose from a notice dated 7th February 1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Order in Tax Assessment Writ Petition Due to Statutory Remedy Foreclosure. High Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Entertaining Writ Petition After Statutory Appeal Was Dismissed as Time-Barred Under Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.

The dispute arose from a tax assessment order dated 21.6.2017 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes against the respondent, a regis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...