Search Results for "advocate duty"

10128 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10128 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — Tribunal Cannot Reduce Mandatory Penalty Under Section 11AC. Assessee Not Entitled to Benefit of Provisos for Payment of Duty and Interest After Show Cause Notice.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Central Excise against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Stamp Duty Assessment on NCLT Order Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 -- Petitioner Challenges Rs. 50,00,000 Duty on Amalgamation Scheme Instrument

The High Court heard a writ petition by Petitioner. challenging stamp duty assessment of Rs. 50,00,000 on an NCLT Mumbai order sanctioning a composite...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru considers batch of income tax appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging ITAT orders for assessment years 2001-02 to 2004-05. Assessee and Revenue both seek to set aside the ITAT decisions and frame substantial questions of law.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru dealt with a batch of income tax appeals filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRT's Power to Impound Unstamped Memorandum of Entry Under Bombay Stamp Act — Instrument Executed Outside State but Produced in Evidence Before Tribunal Properly Impounded.

The petitioner, M/s. WinnQuiz Company Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 16 August 2010. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appellant's Challenge to Stamp Duty and Penalty Order in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement of Sale with Possession Deemed Conveyance Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, and Court Has No Discretion to Impose Lesser Penalty Than Ten Times Deficit Duty Under Section 34.

The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 04.11.1996, which was coupled with possession, thereby deemed a con...