Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application of Police Constables in Murder Case — Section 161 Bombay Police Act Limitation Not Applicable to Offences of Murder and Custodial Violence. The court held that the protection under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act is not available for serious offences like murder and custodial violence, and the application for discharge under Section 227 CrPC was premature.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Prosecution
  • 48
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Manabai w/o Kashirao Tondle, filed a criminal application under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking discharge of non-applicant Nos.1 and 2, who were police constables, from a trial for offences including murder under Sections 302, 304, 324, 325, 364, 365 read with Section 109 and Sections 448, 294 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The incident occurred in October 1989 when the deceased Bhagwan Tondle was in police custody and allegedly assaulted by the constables, leading to his death. A private complaint was filed on 21-2-1994 and a chargesheet on 4-5-1993, both after the six-month period prescribed under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The non-applicants sought discharge on the ground that the prosecution was barred by limitation under Section 161. The court held that Section 161 applies only to acts done under colour of duty or in excess of such duty, and offences like murder and custodial violence are not within its ambit. The court also noted that the application under Section 227 was premature as the trial court had not yet framed charges. The application was dismissed, and the trial was directed to proceed.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Discharge under Section 227 - Scope - The court at the stage of framing of charge is to consider whether there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused, not to weigh evidence meticulously - Held that the application for discharge was premature and the trial court had not yet framed charges (Paras 1-4).

B) Bombay Police Act - Section 161 - Limitation for prosecution - The protection under Section 161 is available only for acts done under colour of duty or in excess of such duty - Offences like murder, custodial violence, and offences under Sections 302, 304, 324, 325, 364, 365, 448, 294, 201 IPC are not acts done under colour of duty - Held that the limitation period of six months does not apply to such serious offences (Paras 3-4).

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 227 - Discharge - The accused cannot seek discharge on the ground of limitation under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act when the alleged acts are not within the scope of that section - Held that the application was misconceived and dismissed (Para 4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the prosecution against police constables for murder and other offences is barred by limitation under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951, and whether the accused are entitled to discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The application for discharge filed by the accused police constables was dismissed. The trial court was directed to proceed with the trial in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Section 161 Bombay Police Act does not apply to offences like murder
  • custodial violence
  • or offences under Indian Penal Code that are not done under colour of duty
  • Section 227 CrPC discharge not automatic
  • limitation period under Section 161 is not a bar for serious offences
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (06) 92

Criminal Application No.3970 of 2006

2013-06-10

M.L. Tahaliyani

Shri Rahul Dhande, Shri A.S. Mardikar, Shri N.R. Rode

Manabai w/o Kashirao Tondle

Jagannath Ganpat Girhe, Ramesh Shriram Rawade, The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal application under Section 227 of CrPC seeking discharge of accused police constables from trial for murder and other offences.

Remedy Sought

Applicant (complainant) sought dismissal of the discharge application filed by the accused police constables.

Filing Reason

The accused police constables sought discharge on the ground that the prosecution was barred by limitation under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act.

Previous Decisions

The trial court had not yet framed charges; the application for discharge was made before framing of charges.

Issues

Whether the prosecution against police constables for murder and other offences is barred by limitation under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951? Whether the accused are entitled to discharge under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

Submissions/Arguments

The accused argued that the complaint and chargesheet were filed after six months from the date of the incident, and thus the prosecution is barred under Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act. The applicant (complainant) opposed the discharge, contending that Section 161 does not apply to offences like murder and custodial violence.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act provides protection only for acts done under colour of duty or in excess of such duty. Offences like murder, custodial violence, and other serious offences under the Indian Penal Code are not acts done under colour of duty, and therefore the limitation period under Section 161 does not apply. The application for discharge under Section 227 CrPC was premature as the trial court had not yet framed charges.

Judgment Excerpts

It is admitted position that the complaint case and chargesheet were filed in the court of law after expiry of six months period stated in Section 161 of the Bombay Police Act. The protection under Section 161 is available only for acts done under colour of duty or in excess of such duty. Offences like murder, custodial violence, and offences under Sections 302, 304, 324, 325, 364, 365, 448, 294, 201 IPC are not acts done under colour of duty.

Procedural History

The incident occurred in October 1989. A private complaint was filed on 21-2-1994 and a chargesheet on 4-5-1993. The case was committed to the Court of Session. The accused filed an application under Section 227 CrPC for discharge, which was heard by the High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304, 324, 325, 364, 365, 109, 448, 294, 201, 34
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 227
  • Bombay Police Act, 1951: 161
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Application of Police Constables in Murder Case — Section 161 Bombay Police Act Limitation Not Applicable to Offences of Murder and Custodial Violence. The court held that the protection under Section 161 of th...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case - Holding Period for Long-Term Capital Gains Determined by Section 2(42A) Explanation 1. Indexation Benefit Requires Asset Held for More Than 36 Months; Inherited Property's Holding Period ...