Search Results for "administrative prerogative"

236 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 236 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KSAT Order Withholding Two Annual Increments with Cumulative Effect for Personal Secretary/Judgment Writer. Disciplinary Authority's Discretion in Imposing Penalty Under Rule 8 of Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1957 Not Interfered With.

The petitioner, S. Purushothama, a Personal Secretary cum Judgment Writer in the office of the Registrar, Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds KSAT Order Withholding Two Annual Increments with Cumulative Effect for Personal Secretary/Judgment Writer. Disciplinary Authority's Discretion in Imposing Penalty Not Interfered With as Punishment Was Proportionate to Misconduct.

The petitioner, S. Purushothama, a Personal Secretary cum Judgment Writer in the office of the Registrar, Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Employee Retired Prematurely Based on Deemed Age — Resolution Cannot Override Service Rules. The Court held that the Board's resolution deeming age as 18 on appointment date could not reduce the actual retirement age under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code.

The appellant, Gopal Prasad, was appointed as Calligraphist-cum-Assistant of the Bihar School Examination Board on 20 May 1970 at about 15½ years of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...