Search Results for "ad-hoc appointments"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Retrenched Daily Wagers Challenging Termination Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act. Appointments for 11-month periods without indicating temporary nature deemed regular, termination illegal.

The petitioners, Arun Rambhau Phatak and Sarjirao Mahadeo Bhalerao, were working as Helpers to Cooks on a daily wage basis from 1984 to 2001 at Mahatm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds School Tribunal Order Reinstating Teacher with 50% Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Management's claim of abandonment of service rejected as termination letter was issued without proper inquiry.

The petitioners, Late Sanjay Gandhi Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Shri Rajeshwar Secondary School and Junior College (collectively 'Management'), chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.

The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Service Matter - MNP Workers Not Entitled to Regularisation. Government Scheme for Village Level Workers Was Temporary and Not a Regular Employment Scheme, Hence No Right to Absorption.

The State of Tamil Nadu appealed against a Division Bench judgment of the Madras High Court which affirmed a Single Judge order directing the State to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Seeking Pay Scales as per Government Notification. Industrial Court's finding that the Government Notification dated 27.07.1989 was not applicable to the complainants and that the settlement at Exh. 48 governed their pay scales was upheld.

The petitioner, a trade union of non-teaching employees of Ramdeobaba Kamla Nehru Engineering College, filed a complaint under the MRTU & PULP Act all...