Search Results for "acquisition lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "acquisition lapse"

694 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 694 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Petitions for Katkari Tribe Members Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013 — Held That Landowners Are Entitled to Higher Compensation Under Section 26(1)(b) and Solatium Under Section 30(1) of the Act, and That the Acquisition Proceedings Were Not Vitiated by Non-Compliance with Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

11 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by members of the Katkari Scheduled Tribe and other landowners challenging the compensation awarde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Ten Years. Landowner Held Entitled to Develop Land After Reservation Lapses Automatically Without Need for Representation.

20 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Pralhad Tulsiram Bundele, owned land bearing Survey No.31/4, area 1.09 HR, at Village Khel Traymbak Narayan, Taluka Achalpur, District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications and Awards for Failure to Conduct Social Impact Assessment and Public Hearing Under RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Non-Compliance with Mandatory Provisions of Sections 4, 11, and 19 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Renders Acquisition Void Ab Initio.

4 May 2023

The Petitioners, Manekbben Rama Tandel and Dharmesh Sukkar Tandel, are owners of land bearing survey Nos. 8, 10/1, 11/2, 11/3 of village Kathiria, Dam...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Compensation Under Petroleum and Minerals Pipelines Act, 1962. Court upholds Competent Authority's award of compensation for right of user over land for pipeline, finding no error in market value determination or procedural compliance.

27 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the compensation awarded b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions for Enhanced Compensation and Apportionment in Land Acquisition Matter. Petitioner, as legal heir, entitled to enhanced compensation under Sections 26-30 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 24(1)(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioner, Faizal Ismail Sutar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court. In Writ Pet...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The acquisition was declared lapsed due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession, despite pending proceedings under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

22 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from land acquisitions by the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Bangalore, for establishing a mega market, involving multipl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Period of Interim Stay Must Be Excluded Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the High Court erred in not excluding the period of interim stay while computing the two-year period for declaring the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and quashed the High Court's order that had declared the acquisition lapsed.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra against the judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) which had qua...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Declares Reservation Lapsed Under Section 127 of MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition Within Statutory Period. Non-acquisition of Reserved Land Within Ten Years from Development Plan Coming into Force and Further Twelve Months After Purchase Notice Triggers Automatic Lapsing Under Section 127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Mar 2019

The dispute arose from the reservation of the petitioners' land in Solapur under the Development Plan 1997-2017 for a Children's Play Ground. The Deve...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions and Review Petitions in Land Acquisition Matter — Finds No Error in Order Declaring Lapse. Acquisition of Lands Deemed Lapsed Under Section 27 of BDA Act and Section 24(2) of 2013 Act as Neither Award Nor Compensation Was Made Within Prescribed Period, Despite Society's and BDA's Contentions.

1 Mar 2019

The case involved a cluster of writ petitions and review petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, challenging an order dated 15.07.2...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)