Search Results for "Western Coalfields"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Western Coalfields"

175 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 175 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge Against Cancellation of Scheduled Caste Certificate Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Scrutiny Committee's Order Set Aside for Failure to Provide Opportunity and Conduct Vigilance Enquiry Under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes Rules, 2012.

30 Aug 2022

The petitioner, Ku. Priyanka d/o Nagesh Erla, claimed to belong to the 'Madiga' Scheduled Caste and sought verification of her caste certificate dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CBI Preliminary Enquiry Registration — No Violation of Lalitha Kumari Deadline as Enquiry Was Completed Within Extended Period. Petitioner, a Chief Vigilance Officer, failed to establish that the preliminary enquiry exceeded the seven-day limit under Section 154 CrPC as interpreted in Lalitha Kumari.

29 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar Gupta, was serving as Chief Vigilance Officer with Western Coalfields Limited, Nagpur. He alleged that he was on inimica...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapsed Land Acquisition Proceedings Under 2013 Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Compliance with Provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition to Refer Industrial Dispute to Arbitration — Industrial Disputes Under I.D. Act Are Not Arbitrable. The court held that disputes under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recovery of wages cannot be referred to arbitration under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Kingfisher Airlines Limited, a public limited company in the air transport industry, filed three writ petitions challenging the reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

8 May 2014

The petitioner, Debashu Services Private Limited, a private limited company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, is a regular assessee under the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Western Coalfields Limited in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence. Jeep Owner Not Liable for Full Compensation as Deceased Employee's Negligence Contributed to Accident.

26 Jul 2019

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 13 August 2004, when Sandeep Gupta, an employee of Western Coalfields Limited (WCL), was drivin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the buyer's refund claim is time-barred as it was filed beyond six months from the date of purchase, and the manufacturer's protest does not extend the limitation for the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging 10% Performance Security Deposit in Railway Catering Contract. Court holds that Railway Board Circular dated 20.11.2020 prescribing 3% performance guarantee is binding and demand for 10% is arbitrary.

19 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Shiv & Sons, a proprietorship concern, responded to a tender notice dated 01.03.2023 issued by the Nagpur Division of Central Rai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is distinct from that of the manufacturer, and the benefit of the second proviso (duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise duty paid by ...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)