Search Results for "Video Evidence"

1135 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1135 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Criminal Appeals Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 147, 148, 302/149 IPC. The Court Assessed the Evidence of a Sole Interested Eye-Witness and the Effect of Hostile Witnesses.

The two criminal appeals arise from Sessions Case No. 234 of 2008, wherein the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune convicted six accused persons for the m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Copyright Infringement Appeal for Telugu Movie 'Roja' — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Ownership of Copyright. Assignment Agreement Not Proved as Witnesses Not Examined and No Evidence of Consideration Paid Under Section 19 of Copyright Act, 1957.

The appellant, Lahari Recording Co. P. Ltd., filed two original side appeals against the common judgment and decree dated 05.01.2016 passed by a learn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment to Petition Seeking Relaxation of Video Conferencing Rules for Recording Evidence from USA. The Court permitted the petitioner to amend the writ petition to incorporate a relevant ruling on relaxation of Video Conferencing Rules under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, Mrs. Rekha Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeals in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case, Upholding Conviction Under IPC Sections 302, 307, and 323 with Common Intention. Conviction Based on Eye-Witness Testimony and Postmortem Evidence, with Alibi Defence Rejected Due to Insufficient Proof.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard two criminal appeals filed by appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty. Petitioner's bail cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC for threatening victim and tampering with evidence, violating bail conditions under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.146/2023, was charged with offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Writ Petition Filed by Complainant-Wife Challenging Rejection of Further Investigation in POCSO Case. Trial Court Had Dismissed Application Under Section 173(8) CrPC Citing Investigating Officer's Discretion and Time-Barred Grounds.

The petitioner, wife of the accused, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the CrPC c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against YouTuber for Disparaging Marico's Products in Video Review. Court holds that false and malicious statements in product reviews can constitute disparagement, and interim injunction can be granted even if defendant is not a competitor.

The plaintiff, Marico Limited, a company manufacturing and selling various consumer products including hair oils and foods, filed a suit against the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Official Secrets Act for Taking Photo of Complaint at Police Station. Petitioner's act of photographing a complaint filed against him does not constitute spying or disclosing secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

The petitioner, Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the ...