Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Under Official Secrets Act for Taking Photo of Complaint at Police Station. Petitioner's act of photographing a complaint filed against him does not constitute spying or disclosing secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No. 168 of 2022 registered at Mira Road Police Station for an alleged offence under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, and the consequent charge-sheet (RCC 1811 of 2022) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The prosecution case was that on 20th April 2022, the petitioner was called to the Mira Road Police Station for enquiry regarding a complaint (Application No. 245 of 2022) made against him. During the enquiry by API Vijay Chavan, the petitioner sought a copy of the complaint, which was given to him to read but he was not allowed to take a photocopy or photograph. The petitioner then took a photo and video of the complaint on his mobile phone. When the officer checked the phone, the photo and video were found, leading to the registration of the FIR under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed. The petitioner argued that the complaint was not a secret document and that he had a right to obtain a copy of it. The court examined the allegations and found that the complaint was not a secret document and the petitioner's act of taking a photograph did not constitute spying or disclosure of secret information under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act. The court held that the ingredients of the offence were not made out and quashed the FIR and charge-sheet.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Official Secrets Act - Section 3 - Spying - Taking photograph of complaint at police station - The petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry regarding a complaint against him. He sought a copy of the complaint, which was refused. He then took a photo and video of the complaint on his mobile phone. The court held that the complaint was not a secret document and the petitioner's act did not fall within the purview of Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, which deals with spying and disclosure of secret information. The FIR and charge-sheet were quashed. (Paras 3-6)

B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 482 - Inherent powers - Quashing of FIR - The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC read with Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the FIR and charge-sheet as the allegations did not make out any offence under the Official Secrets Act. (Paras 3, 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether taking a photograph of a complaint filed against the petitioner at a police station constitutes an offence under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the petition and quashed the FIR bearing C.R. No. 168 of 2022 registered with Mira Road Police Station and the charge-sheet being RCC 1811 of 2022 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane.

Law Points

  • Official Secrets Act
  • Section 3
  • Spying
  • Secret information
  • Photographing complaint
  • Police station
  • Quashing of FIR
  • Inherent powers
  • Section 482 CrPC
  • Article 226 Constitution
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (BOM) (11) 77

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022

2022-11-28

Revati Mohite Dere, R. N. Laddha

2022:BHC-AS:29361-DB

Mr. Anees Shaikh (for Petitioner), Mr. J. P. Yagnik, A.P.P. (for Respondent State)

Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique

The State of Maharashtra (Through Mira Road Police Station)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet under Official Secrets Act.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR No. 168 of 2022 and charge-sheet RCC 1811 of 2022.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was charged under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act for taking a photo of a complaint filed against him at a police station.

Issues

Whether taking a photograph of a complaint filed against the petitioner at a police station constitutes an offence under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the complaint was not a secret document and he had a right to obtain a copy. Respondent State argued that the petitioner's act of taking a photo without permission violated the Official Secrets Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The act of taking a photograph of a complaint filed against the petitioner at a police station does not fall within the purview of Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, as the complaint is not a secret document and the petitioner's action does not constitute spying or disclosure of secret information.

Judgment Excerpts

By this petition, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR bearing C.R. No. 168 of 2022 registered with the Mira Road Police Station, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923 and consequently the charge-sheet filed in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane, being No. RCC 1811 of 2022. The court held that the ingredients of Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act were not made out and quashed the FIR and charge-sheet.

Procedural History

FIR No. 168 of 2022 was registered at Mira Road Police Station on 20th April 2022. After investigation, charge-sheet RCC 1811 of 2022 was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thane. The petitioner then filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 3894 of 2022 before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the FIR and charge-sheet.

Acts & Sections

  • Official Secrets Act, 1923: Section 3
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 482
  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Refer Dispute to Arbitration in Family Settlement Matter. Dispute regarding implementation of Escrow Agent directions under Indenture of Family Settlement held arbitrable under Sections 5 and 8 of Arbitration and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Police Patil Candidate Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointment Based on Legal Heir Preference. Preference Rule Valid as Tilting Factor Among Equally Qualified Candidates Under Government Gazette Not...