Search Results for "Vague allegations"

1370 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1370 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Proceedings Against In-Laws in Matrimonial Dispute. Court rules allegations vague, finds continuation of case against deceased's parents-in-law an abuse of legal process.

Jurisdiction and Abuse of Legal Process in Matrimonial Dispute. The legal aspects, proceedings, and judicial findings regarding the petitioners' chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Domestic Violence Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Established. Allegations of Demand for Car and Cash Found Vague and Unsupported by Evidence Under Sections 498-A IPC and 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, Dr. Saurabh Velukar (husband), his mother Adv. Surekha Yelurkar, and father Dr. Shivhar Yelurkar, filed a writ petition under Article...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Dowry and Cruelty Against Husband and In-Laws Due to Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process. Complaint Alleging Demand of Gold Chain and Harassment for Additional Dowry Found Lacking Specificity, Leading to Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to a criminal application filed by Vishwaradhya Mahaling Swamy, his mother Nirmala @ Neelamma, and father Mahaling Gurubasayya S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Proceedings Against Husband and In-laws Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Complaint Filed at Pune While Shared Household Was in Hyderabad — Held That Jurisdiction Lies Where Cause of Action Arises, Not at Wife's Temporary Residence.

The petitioners, the husband and his parents, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the proceedings initiat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging BCCI's Amendment Excluding IPL and CLT20 from Conflict of Interest Regulations. The court held that the amendment was a valid policy decision by a private body and not subject to judicial review unless it violates statutory provisions or fundamental rights.

The petitioner, Cricket Association of Bihar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the amendment to Regulation 6.2.4 of the BCCI Regul...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Striking of Election Petition Paragraphs in Municipal Election Dispute. Court upholds that vague allegations of corrupt practices without specific details of consent by the returned candidate are liable to be struck off under Order VI Rule 16 CPC.

The petitioner, Eknath Bayaji Gadkari, filed an election petition under Section 33(1) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenging the e...