Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 25F compliance"

168 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 168 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement and Back Wages for Employee Terminated Without Notice in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Employer's Failure to Prove Abandonment of Service and Non-Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Termination Illegal.

22 Aug 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Goodlass Nerolac Paints Limited under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an award of the ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Industrial Dispute, Modifying Compensation for Daily Wager. The Court held that while termination of a daily wager without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, reinstatement is not automatic and monetary compensation is appropriate where no unfair labour practice or retention of juniors is established.

2 Sep 2021

The dispute involved an industrial worker challenging his termination by a public authority. The appellant, a daily wager, claimed he was verbally app...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Casual Worker in BSNL Case — 50% Back Wages Upheld. Continuous Service of 371 Days Over 13 Months Constitutes Regular Employment Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

3 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), challenged an award dated 12.11.2003 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.1, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Holds That High Court Must Order Payment Under Section 17-B During Pendency of Employer's Writ Against Reinstatement Award. Section 17-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Imposes Mandatory Duty on Court to Direct Employer to Pay Full Wages Last Drawn by Workman Who Is Not Employed Elsewhere.

23 Mar 2005

The case arose from a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Vishwas Shankarrao Joshi, General Secretary of Bank of Maharashtra Karmachari Sangh, a trade unio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Closure of Shipping Company Office. Labour Court's Finding of Genuine Closure Upheld; No Unfair Labour Practice Under Items 1(b) and 1(d) of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

28 Aug 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Lionel Edward & India Steamship Employees Union challenging the dismissal of their complaint of unfair labo...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Industrial Tribunal's Award Directing Permanent Absorption of 2700 Sweepers and Loaders Engaged in Solid Waste Management. The Case Involves Determination Whether Workers Who Performed Essential Statutory Duties for Over 240 Days Are Entitled to Regularization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Despite Being Engaged Through Intermediaries.

22 Dec 2016

The Mumbai Municipal Corporation, established under the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, challenged an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai...

High Court

Madras High Court Partly Allows Management’s Writ Petitions Challenging Labour Court’s Closure Compensation Awards Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Allows Workers’ Writ Petitions Against Dismissal of Claim Petitions. Labour Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Adjudicating Disputed Last Drawn Wage, and Compensation Is Recalculated Based on Undisputed Wages; Dismissal of Legal Heirs’ Claim Petitions Is Set Aside and Remanded for Fresh Consideration on Merits.

9 Jul 2026

The case arose from the closure of Saram Co-operative Spinning Mill on 13 January 1999 without following the mandatory procedure under the Industrial ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

2 Apr 2013

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order — Daily Wager Not Entitled to Reinstatement for Failure to Complete 240 Days Service. The court held that the workman did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the 12 months preceding retrenchment, and thus the Labour Court's award of reinstatement with backwages was perverse and unsustainable.

7 Oct 2005

The petitioner, M/s. Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged the award of the First Labour Court, Pune, in Reference (IDA) No.36 of 1990, which directed reinst...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement but Quashes Backwages in Industrial Dispute Case. Violation of Sections 25F and 25G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Found, but Backwages Denied as Employee Was Gainfully Employed During Pendency.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Anant Yeshwantrao Mahulkar, was employed with the Deputy Conservator of Forest, Amravati Forest Division. His services were terminated...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)