Search Results for "Section 16(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 16(1)"

2268 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2268 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to Advance Ruling on India-UAE DTAA and Revocable Trust Taxation. Writ Petitions Concern Taxability of Income from Indian Investments by UAE-Owned Trust Under Sections 61 and 63 of Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 24 of India-UAE Tax Treaty.

28 Oct 2021

The matter before the Bombay High Court consisted of two writ petitions filed by Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) and Equity Trust (Jersey) Limit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of DRAT Orders on Pre-Deposit Waiver and Status Quo in Secured Asset Auction. Legal Question Concerns Applicability of Section 18 Pre-Deposit Requirement to Appeals Dismissing Condonation of Delay and Challenging Sale Certificate.

8 Jun 2026

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by an auction purchaser (Aloukik Construwell LLP) and a secured creditor (HDFC Bank Limited) challengin...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka hears writ petitions and appeals challenging the Government Order dated 12 August 2008 that handed over the administration of Sri Mahabaleshwara Devaru Temple, Gokarna to Sri Ramachandrapura Mutt. The court examines the legality of the order under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, relevant endowments laws, and Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

10 Aug 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for BDA Layout. The petitions sought quashing of preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 under the Karnataka BDA Act, 1976 regarding Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout.

11 Jul 2014

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores POCSO and IT Act Charges in Child Pornography Case — High Court Erred in Quashing Chargesheet Without Considering Presumption of Culpable Mental State. Possession of Child Pornographic Material, Even Without Intent to Distribute, Constitutes an Offence Under Section 15(1) of POCSO and Section 67B of IT Act.

23 Sep 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Just Rights for Children Alliance and another child rights organization against the judgment of the Mad...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Scope of 'Child' under POCSO Act in Appeal Concerning Mentally Challenged Victim. Mental Age of Adult with Cerebral Palsy Considered for Applicability of Special Procedures under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

1 Aug 2026

The case concerned a criminal appeal by the prosecutrix, a 38-year-old woman suffering from cerebral palsy (R. Hemiparesis), through her mother. An FI...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FIRs for Illegal Mining Despite Compounding Under MMDR Act — IPC Offences Are Distinct and Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act. The court held that compounding under the MMDR Act does not bar prosecution under the IPC for theft and criminal misappropriation, as the offences are separate and distinct.

1 Sep 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by private appellants and the State of Madhya Pradesh against the High Court's refusal to quash FIRs for illegal m...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Hostel Owner in Raid Case Due to Procedural Bar Under Section 195 CrPC and Lack of Ingredients for Section 353 IPC. Court holds that cognizance under Section 186 IPC without written complaint by public servant is barred, and FIR under Section 353 IPC lacked allegations of assault or criminal force.

6 Jan 2025

The appellant, B.N. John, was the owner and manager of a hostel run by Sampoorna Development India for underprivileged children. On 03.06.2015, offici...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.

9 Dec 2022

The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)