Search Results for "Rule 222"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Suit Not Barred by Limitation Under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves an interim application filed by the defendants in a commercial suit for specific performance. The plaintiff, Rajdhani Textiles Pvt. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010480352008_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010306832010_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Second Appeals in RERA Delayed Possession Matter. Builder Challenges Appellate Tribunal's Direction to Pay Interest at 10.05% p.a. from February 2014.

These Second Appeals were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay by Runwal Constructions, a registered partnership firm, challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Rejecting Condonation of 856-Day Delay in Filing Appeal Against Decree on Admission. Petitioner's Withdrawal of Timely Appeal and Subsequent Delay Not Justified as Sufficient Cause Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, MSTC Limited, a Government of India Enterprise, filed a Writ Petition challenging the order dated 9 November 2022 passed by the Debt R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 7A EPF Act Order — Petitioner Failed to Produce Records Despite Opportunities. Determination of Provident Fund Dues Upheld as Authority Considered Available Documents and Enforcement Officer's Report.

The petitioner, Rajendra V. Vichare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Condonation of Delay Petition in Specific Performance Suit — 1749-Day Delay Unexplained. Petitioners Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay in Filing Revision Against Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Exparte Decree.

The petitioners, defendants in a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 01.03.2012, faced an exparte decree. They filed an applic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Second Appeal in Salt Land Dispute — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 4(2) of Salt Act, 1882. Exclusive Jurisdiction of Salt Commissioner Precludes Civil Court from Entertaining Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession of Salt Land.

The Union of India, through the Deputy Salt Commissioner, filed a second appeal against the judgment of the District Judge, Thane, which confirmed the...