Search Results for "Retiral benefits"

505 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 505 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Issued on Retirement Day for Non-Submission of Caste Validity Certificate. Departmental Action Initiated After Superannuation Without Pending Proceedings or Pension Disallowance Is Barred by Service Rules.

The petitioner, Narendra K. Kumbhare, was employed with United India Insurance Co. Ltd. from 24.04.1985 as a Typist and was promoted over the years, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Excess Salary from Retired Employee; Directs Pension Refixation and Payment of Benefits with Interest. Recovery impermissible as excess payment made for over five years and employee belongs to Class III, applying principles from State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih.

The petitioner, Gendlal Dharkar, was initially appointed as a Tracer in Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran on 27/09/1991. Over the years, he received a ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Pensionary Benefits from Retired Class III Employee in Pay Fixation Dispute. Recovery of Rs.77,446/- directed after 17 years of pay fixation without misrepresentation by employee held unsustainable.

The petitioner, Devidas Marotirao Kandhare, a retired junior clerk (Class III) under the Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired Professor's Petition, Quashes Recovery from Gratuity and Pension. Recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from retiral benefits set aside as employer failed to prove misrepresentation or fraud by employee, and recovery from pension/gratuity is impermissible under settled law.

The petitioner, Ganesh Sitaram Magar, a retired Ayurved professor, challenged the recovery of Rs.8,43,782/- from his gratuity and pension benefits. He...