Search Results for "Release Deed"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charges Against Accused No.3 in Cheating Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery or Dishonest Intent. Petitioner Discharged Under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468 IPC as Allegations of Fabrication of Sale Deed Not Supported by Material on Record.

The petitioner, Jayaprakash M.R., was arrayed as accused No.3 in C.C.No.452/2019 pending before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC at Belur, Hassan, for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in MOFA Case Due to Binding Consent Decrees — Competent Authority Cannot Override Civil Court Decrees. Consent Decree Operates as Res Judicata and Estoppel Between Parties Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The Petitioner, owner of a larger property, had constructed a building and sold flats to purchasers who formed Respondent No. 2 Society. The Petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was of the essence in the agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007, and the plaintiff did not demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform his part of the contract.

The appeal arose from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 25.04.2007 between the plaintiff (appellant) and the defendant (r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Recall/Review of Order Allowing Secured Creditor to Release Leasehold Rights. Applicant, an ex-director and guarantor, lacked locus standi as he was not a party to the original application and no fraud or mistake was established.

The judgment concerns an application filed by Mr Shashikant Pasari, an ex-director and guarantor of Rajan (Textile) Mills Pvt Ltd (in liquidation), se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Collector to Consider NA Permission Application Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Petitioner's Application Must Be Decided on Merits Without Being Influenced by Civil Court Orders Regarding Title Disputes.

The petitioner, M/s Annapurna Land Developers, a partnership firm, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a dire...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...