Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Rehabilitation and Resettlement Policy"

144 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 144 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Land Acquisition by BDA Due to Lapse of Proceedings — Acquisition Initiated in 1993 Deemed Lapsed as Possession Not Taken and Compensation Not Paid Within Five Years Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

29 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Sri B S Sudhakar Shetty, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a Government Order ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Subsequent Purchaser in Land Acquisition Case — Purchase After Section 4 Notification Confers No Right to Challenge Acquisition or Invoke Section 24 of 2013 Act.

14 Oct 2019

The Supreme Court considered whether a purchaser of land after issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can invoke...

High Court

KAHC010645132024_1

19 Dec 2025

The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.

20 Dec 2017

The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BDA to Hand Over Vacant Possession of Land Unauthorizedly Appropriated Without Acquisition — Senior Citizen's Land Used for Layout Formation Without Due Process. The Court held that the BDA's admission of unauthorized use of land without acquisition constituted a clear violation of the petitioner's right to property, and the BDA cannot be allowed to benefit from its own wrong.

1 Mar 2019

The petitioner, a senior citizen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India complaining against the callous and grossly cul...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jan 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Public Interest Litigation for Rejuvenation of Godavari River Due to Extensive Pollution — Directs Implementation of NEERI Recommendations and Preventive Measures. Pollution of Godavari River by untreated sewage, industrial effluents, and religious activities violates public trust doctrine and Article 51A(g); preventive steps ordered under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949 and Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

18 Dec 2018

This public interest litigation was filed by citizens of Nashik seeking directions to clean and prevent pollution of river Godavari, the second longes...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Eviction Notice Under Public Premises Act — Tenant's Rights Upheld. The Court held that premises owned by a nationalised company not taken over by the Central Government are not 'public premises' under Section 2(e) of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971, and the eviction notice was invalid.

7 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Dr. Suhas H. Pophale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the P...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)