CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
Search Results for "Regular Civil Suit"
3621 result(s) found
Found 3621 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Abatement of Suit for Easement of Necessity. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives of Deceased Plaintiff Within Limitation Leads to Abatement of Entire Suit Under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC.
29 Sep 2006The petitioners, original plaintiffs 1 to 4 and 6, along with Banubai Hariba Mohite (original plaintiff no.5), filed Regular Civil Suit No.278 of 1981...
- 128
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeal Against Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale — Appeal Filed Under Section 96 CPC Challenging Findings on Readiness and Willingness and Order II Rule 2 Bar. The Appeal Raises Issues of Maintainability Under Order II Rule 2 CPC and Proof of Readiness and Willingness.
11 Aug 2023The dispute arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale of immovable property dated 15.03.2010 filed by the respondent-plaint...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Disposes of Two Writ Petitions and a Civil Application in a Property Dispute Involving Alleged Fraudulent Consent Decree. The Court Examined the Challenge to the Trial Court's Rejection of Applications to Stay and Set Aside the Consent Decree Passed in Favor of the Respondent in a Suit for Injunction.
28 Jan 2015The case involves two writ petitions and a civil application arising out of a property dispute regarding two flats on the seventh floor of Flushel Apa...
- 47
High Court
High Court Hears Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Dismissal of Declaration Suit. Suit Filed by Brother of Deceased Religious Head for Declaration of Ownership of Property Allotted in 1952, Dismissed by Trial Court.
28 Mar 2014This Regular First Appeal and cross-objections arise from the judgment and decree dated 9 September 2005 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessio...
- 54
High Court
Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.
21 Jan 2025The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute — Sets Aside Decree for Specific Performance. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
1 Jul 2014The appellant, Mrs. Kiran Nashine, filed two appeals against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2009 passed by the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division...
- 54
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Second Appeal Against Decree Granting Declaration and Possession; Operative Part Missing. The appeal challenges the first appellate court's reversal of the trial court's dismissal, but the judgment's conclusion is not provided.
27 Apr 2026The dispute involves a regular second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the appellants (original defendants) bef...
- 21
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Condones Delay in Cross-Objection in Partition Suit Involving Muslim Law. Court Determines that 89-Year-Old Defendant Suffering from Old Age Ailments and Lacking Family Support Constituted Sufficient Grounds to Condone 614-Day Delay in Filing Cross-Objection.
4 Apr 2025The dispute concerned a suit for partition filed by the appellants (plaintiffs), who are the brothers and sister of the deceased Shahnaz Begum, agains...
- 15
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy
25 Sep 2013The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...
- 446
