High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Income Tax Appeals Filed by Assessee and Revenue Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961. Multiple Appeals Clubbed for Hearing Involving Assessment Years 2001-2002 to 2004-2005.
25 Mar 2015...
Search Results for "Promoters and Builders Association"
114 result(s) found
Found 114 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand on Sub-Lease of Multiplex — Lease Premium Not Part of Consideration for Sub-Lease Under Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. The Court held that the expression 'consideration for the sub-lease' in Article 35(a) of Schedule I of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 refers only to the consideration moving from the sub-lessee to the sub-lessor, and not the premium paid by the original lessee to the lessor.
9 Jul 2014The petitioner, CR Retail Malls (India) Limited, challenged an order dated 21 March 2013 passed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtr...
- 178
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Penalty and Royalty for Unauthorized Excavation of Earth During Sewerage Pipeline Project. Revenue Officials' Demand Under Section 48(7) of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Quashed as Excavation Was Incidental to Public Works Contract and Not for Commercial Use.
28 Mar 2024The petitioners, M/s. Ramky Infrastructure Ltd. and its shareholder, challenged the imposition of penalty and royalty by revenue officials under Secti...
- 66
Tribunals
NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Challenging Admission of Section 7 Application by Allottees Against Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT order allowing impleadment of allottees and admitting the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as default was established.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to two appeals filed against an order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Principal B...
- 163
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Setting Aside of Auction Sale Under SARFAESI Act — Non-Compliance with Notice Requirements Under Section 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act Renders Sale Invalid. DRT and DRAT Orders Upheld, Bank Directed to Follow Statutory Procedure Before Re-auction.
22 Jun 2023The petitioners, Akola Janata Commercial Co-operative Bank Ltd. and its Branch Manager/Authorised Officer, challenged the judgment of the Debt Recover...
- 40
High Court
High Court of Bombay Allows Petitioner in Trade Mark Rectification Case Due to Prior Rights and Dishonest Adoption. Impugned 'C21' Registrations Cancelled as Respondent Incorporated 'CENTURY 21' into Corporate Name and Registered Identical Marks Without Explanation, Violating Sections 11, 47, 57 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Mar 2026The dispute involved a multinational franchising company, the Petitioner, engaged in real estate business under the marks 'CENTURY 21' and 'C21', chal...
- 294
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty Notice for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Permit — Holds That Prior Approval Under Section 21(6) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 Is Not Required for Government Companies Executing Railway Projects. The court found that the notice proposing penalty for excavation of minor mineral without permission was invalid as the petitioners were a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways and the excavation was for a public purpose.
29 Mar 2019The petitioners, Ircon International Limited (a Public Sector Undertaking of the Ministry of Railways) and others, challenged a notice dated 4th Decem...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.
5 Dec 2015The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...
- 83
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Notification Declaring Gram Panchayat as Municipal Board - Constitutional Validity of State Notification Under Article 243Q Upheld. The Court held that Article 243Q of the Constitution does not mandate a separate notification by the Governor for specifying a transitional area, and the State's notification under Section 5 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 2009, issued on behalf of the Governor, is sufficient and valid.
10 Mar 2022The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Judicature of Rajasthan dated 28.4.2015, which set aside a notification dated 12.8.2014 declaring ...
- 269
