Search Results for "Passport Seizure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Passport Seizure"

128 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 128 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Discharge Petition in Excise Duty Evasion Case — No Prima Facie Case for Discharge Established. Petitioner, a German national and director of a distillery, failed to show that the allegations under IPC and PC Act were groundless, as the charge sheet and material disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed.

19 Sep 2019

The petitioner, Rakesh Rastogi, a German national and director of M/s. Krimpy Distillery, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Cons...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under UAPA for Conspiracy to Commit Terrorist Acts — Acquittal for Attempt to Commit Offences Under IPC and UAPA. Appellants convicted under Section 18 of Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts, but acquitted of attempt and other charges due to lack of evidence.

3 Dec 2018

The case involves an appeal by Abdul Latif Abdul Rashid Shaikh @ Guddu and Riaz Ali Abubakar Shaikh @ Riyan against their conviction under Section 18 ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in 2012 Pune Bomb Blast Case Due to Long Pre-Trial Detention of Over 9 Years and Weak Evidence of Involvement. Prolonged detention without trial violates right to speedy trial under Article 21; bail granted under Section 21(4) of NIA Act.

27 Sep 2022

The appellant, Munib Memon, was arrested in connection with the 2012 Pune bomb blast case (German Bakery blast) and had been in judicial custody for a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Appeal Against Conviction for Offences Under IPC, Explosive Substances Act, Arms Act, and UAPA. Appellant Challenges Trial Court Findings Alleging Inconsistent Evidence and Procedural Lapses.

29 Nov 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case on Ground of Parity and Long Incarceration. Co-accused already granted bail; applicants entitled to same relief under Sections 140(2), 308(7), 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

16 Dec 2025

The applicants, Ramdev Singh Jadeja, Vishal Mir, and Chintan Arvindbhai Desai, filed a bail application under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against CBI Investigation Order in NSEL Scam Case. Court holds that an applicant not an accused has no locus standi to challenge investigation orders under Section 397 CrPC.

4 Jun 2018

The applicant, Jignesh Prakash Shah, filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Citing Delay in Trial and No Prima Facie Evidence of Terrorist Act. The court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) of UAPA is not absolute and can be relaxed when the right to speedy trial under Article 21 is violated, and the accused has been in custody for over two years without trial.

29 May 2023

The appellant, Imran Ahmed, was arrested in connection with Spl.C.C.No.141/2021 for offences under Sections 16, 18, 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Pre...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Bail to Accused in Terror Funding Case Under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 — High Court Order Set Aside for Erroneous Application of Section 43D(5) Bar. The Court held that the bar under Section 43D(5) applies when the court finds a prima facie case, and the High Court's approach was contrary to law.

1 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) against the Delhi High Court's order granting bail to Zahoor Ahm...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)