Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development & Regulation) Act"

108 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 108 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Registrar's Order Cancelling APMC Resolutions for Violating Statutory Rules. Rule 108 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Sale-Purchase (Development and Regulation) Rules, 1967 Mandates Chairman, Vice Chairman, and Secretary as Signatories; Any Deviation Requires Specific Authorization.

18 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a director of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC), Pathri, challenged an order of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Co-oper...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator for Agriculture Produce Market Committee — Appointment of Administrator Without Prior Dissolution of Committee Under Section 47 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963 Held Illegal. The court held that an Administrator cannot be appointed under Section 48 without first dissolving the Committee under Section 47 of the Act.

11 Apr 2022

The petitioner, Laxmikant s/o Mahadeorao Lad, Vice President of the Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Kaij, filed a writ petition challenging the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Mills' Challenge to Cess Notification on Sugarcane. State Notification Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce (Development and Regulation) Act, 1965 Held Ultra Vires Due to Repugnancy with Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

30 Apr 2020

The petitioners, seven sugar mills in Maharashtra, challenged a Government notification dated 22.3.2018 issued under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Agri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Recount Order in APMC Election — Commissioner's Order Quashed for Violating Natural Justice and Lack of Application of Mind.

11 Feb 2019

The petitioner, Milind Shreeram Tayade, was elected as a member of the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee (APMC), Amravati, from a seat reserved...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

19 Jul 2018

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Society's Refusal to Register Hamals as Members. Court upholds Registrar's order that hamals working in Agricultural Produce Market Committee are not entitled to membership under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 as they are not 'agriculturists' or 'persons dealing with agricultural produce'.

2 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Rajendra Tikaram Bagmare, a hamal (porter) working at the Agricultural Produce Market Committee in Yavatmal, filed a writ petition und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of Agricultural Produce Market Committee Members Due to Availability of Alternative Statutory Remedy Under Section 15 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963. The Court Held That Disputed Questions of Fact Regarding Nomination and Counting Cannot Be Adjudicated in Writ Jurisdiction and Directed Petitioners to Avail Election Petition Remedy.

23 Dec 2015

The petitioners, who were candidates in the election for members of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Kamptee, filed a writ petition under Ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Market Committee Member Against Disqualification for Resigning as Gram Panchayat Member. Resignation from Gram Panchayat Does Not Disqualify Under Section 13(1)(a)(ii) of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

8 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Purshottam Tonpe, was elected as a member of Gram Panchayat, Mahakal. Subsequently, he contested and won election to the Agriculture P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Extension of APMC Managing Committee Term Under Section 14(3) of Maharashtra APMC Act, 1963. The Court held that the State Government's power to extend the term of a managing committee is statutory and does not require prior consultation, and the petitioner had no locus standi to challenge the order.

20 Jul 2011

The petitioner, Ashok s/o Parlhadrao Thakre, a member of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Digras, filed a writ petition challenging an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Eligibility to Contest APMC Election Despite Election Being Held, Holds That Deletion of Rule 88 Does Not Bar Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226. The Court set aside the order declaring respondent no.2 eligible to contest the election and directed rejection of his nomination papers, as the alternate remedy of election petition under Rule 88 of the APMC Rules was deleted.

23 Sep 2010

The petitioner, Sadashivrao Ganpatrao Mahajan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagp...

7 8 9 10 11

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)